Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #10
Trap EDM · 55 min · analysed 26 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Yellow Claw.
In short
Yellow Claw - #10 by Yellow Claw scores 82/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).
This DJ understands that in a festival setting, the transition is not just a bridge, but a tool for escalating tension.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Exceptional energy management
- Precise digital execution
- Strong artistic identity
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:00, 29:00, 44:00, 48:12). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Incorporate a brief melodic breakdown to add emotional depth.
- Experiment with 'silence as a weapon' to create more dramatic drop entries.
- Ensure gain levels are perfectly matched when switching between genres with different sub-densities.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed transition from cinematic intro to heavy bass.
Intentional reset
Strategic disruption
Sharp transition into a trap-heavy section, perfectly timed with the vocal sample.
Effective transition from half-time trap to full-time hardstyle energy.
About this trap edm set
Yellow Claw - #10 is a trap edm DJ set by Yellow Claw, running 55 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This DJ understands that in a festival setting, the transition is not just a bridge, but a tool for escalating tension.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 17 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 948.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This DJ understands that in a festival setting, the transition is not just a bridge, but a tool for escalating tension.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%81
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%88
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%88
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Hard cut on the drop
Perfectly timed transition from cinematic intro to heavy bass.
Perfect Impact Swap
intentional_reset
Minor EQ Overlap
Clean Genre Switch
strategic_disruption
Noticeable Level Jump
Impact cut with riser overlap
Sharp transition into a trap-heavy section, perfectly timed with the vocal sample.
BPM jump with drum fill
Effective transition from half-time trap to full-time hardstyle energy.
Technical subscores
81
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
90
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
84
Loudness control
85
Musical coherence
79
Harmonic compatibility
84
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
21 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
244 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,277
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
126
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
595
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
426
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (4×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:00, 29:00, 44:00, 48:12). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Exceptional energy management
- Precise digital execution
- Strong artistic identity
Timeline
- 03:45The Launch
- 06:50Vocal Breakdown
- 20:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 27:15Genre Pivot
Coaching notes
- Incorporate a brief melodic breakdown to add emotional depth.
- Experiment with 'silence as a weapon' to create more dramatic drop entries.
- Ensure gain levels are perfectly matched when switching between genres with different sub-densities.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Yellow Claw's Yellow Claw - #10 get?
- Yellow Claw - #10 scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Yellow Claw - #10?
- The analysed recording runs 55 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Yellow Claw sets analysed
Similar trap edm sets
- Crankdat — CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 202682
- Crankdat — CRANKDAT - DIPLO AND FRIENDS MIX81
- Crankdat — CRANKDAT @ EDC ORLANDO 202383
- Crankdat — CRANKDAT @ EDC LAS VEGAS 202484
- Crankdat — CRANKDAT @ LOST LANDS 202485
- RL Grime — DJ Snake x RL Grime x Flosstradamus - Live @ Coachella 2026 (Week 2)85
- Baauer — Mix for Triple J Mixup Exclusives79
- Crankdat — Crankdat - Red Rocks 202685
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research