Crankdat — CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026
Trap EDM · 1h 24m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Crankdat.
In short
CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026 by Crankdat scores 82/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is STORYTELLING (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).
This DJ understands that energy is not just about volume, but about the contrast between tension and release.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 42:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Incorporate more melodic breathers to create a more dynamic energy arc.
- Experiment with longer, more layered blends to showcase technical depth.
- Smooth out transitions between extreme BPM shifts to avoid jarring the listener.
- Vary the intensity of the pressure to create a more engaging narrative.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed drop alignment that doubles the energy impact.
Smooth transition into a melodic breakdown, providing necessary breathing room.
Perfectly timed swap that catches the crowd off guard while maintaining the groove.
Smooth transition between two melodic sections, maintaining harmonic coherence.
Intentional reset
About this trap edm set
CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026 is a trap edm DJ set by Crankdat, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This DJ understands that energy is not just about volume, but about the contrast between tension and release.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 24 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 808.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This DJ understands that energy is not just about volume, but about the contrast between tension and release.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%84
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%88
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%82
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%80
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%87
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Double-drop impact cut
Perfectly timed drop alignment that doubles the energy impact.
Vocal-led breakdown transition
Smooth transition into a melodic breakdown, providing necessary breathing room.
Drop swap with vocal teaser
Perfectly timed swap that catches the crowd off guard while maintaining the groove.
Long melodic blend during breakdown
Smooth transition between two melodic sections, maintaining harmonic coherence.
Perfect Drop Swap
intentional_reset
Minor Level Jump
Technical subscores
85
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
93
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
84
Musical coherence
82
Harmonic compatibility
86
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
27 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
183 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,995
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
20
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
1218
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
226
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (3×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 42:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:45Cinematic Intro
- 5:30Energy Peak
- 7:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 15:10Double Drop Impact
- 20:30Vocal Hype Segment
Coaching notes
- Incorporate more melodic breathers to create a more dynamic energy arc.
- Experiment with longer, more layered blends to showcase technical depth.
- Smooth out transitions between extreme BPM shifts to avoid jarring the listener.
- Vary the intensity of the pressure to create a more engaging narrative.
- Incorporate more varied pressure releases to enhance the impact of the drops.
- Experiment with longer melodic breakdowns to deepen the emotional narrative.
- Use high-pass filters more creatively during transitions to create unique sonic textures.
- Consider adding more live-remixing elements to further distinguish the performance.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Crankdat's CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026 get?
- CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026 scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is CRANKDAT LIVE @ RED ROCKS 2026?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Crankdat sets analysed
Similar trap edm sets
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #882
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #1082
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #781
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 201783
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw live at EDC Las Vegas 202383
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #681
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - Live At Ultra Miami (2016)83
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - Live @ EDC Las Vegas 201583
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research