CrankdatCrankdat - Red Rocks 2026

    Trap EDM · 1h 24m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 24m
    Genre
    Trap EDM

    About this trap edm set

    Crankdat - Red Rocks 2026 is a trap edm DJ set by Crankdat, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix succeeds by treating energy as a physical force, meticulously guided through cinematic peaks and valleys.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 18 points, moving between 40 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 749.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 26 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This mix succeeds by treating energy as a physical force, meticulously guided through cinematic peaks and valleys.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured72
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI86
    PayoffAI97

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI42

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI43
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI69
    SignatureAI92

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 87.

    Energy arc

    0:0072:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:12

    High-impact drop swap

    Perfectly timed transition into the first major drop, maximizing energy.

    92
    6:48

    Vocal-led phrase blend

    Smooth integration of a new vocal hook over the existing bassline.

    88
    12:20

    Impact Cut

    intentional_reset

    100
    16:25

    EQ Blend

    82
    20:10

    Double Drop

    strategic_disruption

    100
    25:45

    Perfect Impact Cut

    strategic_disruption

    100
    29:40

    Minor Level Jump

    82

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    94

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    26.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    184.4 ms

    Drift p95

    4,995

    Boundaries detected

    19

    Hard cuts / h

    4994

    Clipping events

    219

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (38:42, 48:00, 68:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:30Cinematic Intro
    • 8:15Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with 'fake-out' drops to increase crowd engagement.
    • Use brief moments of total silence to reset the sonic pressure.
    • Incorporate more minor-key melodic elements for emotional variety.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Crankdat's Crankdat - Red Rocks 2026 get?
    Crankdat - Red Rocks 2026 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Crankdat - Red Rocks 2026?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Crankdat sets analysed

    Similar trap edm sets

    All Crankdat analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.