Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017

In short

Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017 by Yellow Claw scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

The DJ uses their voice as a primary tool for tension management, creating a unique and highly engaging performance.

Key takeaways

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

• 0:58Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 0:58

  Perfectly timed transition into the first major drop, maximizing initial impact.

• 4:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 4:12

  Energetic switch that keeps the tempo high without losing the groove.

• 7:45Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 7:45

  A bit abrupt, causing a slight dip in momentum, though the vocal recovers it.

• 12:48Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 12:48

  Perfectly timed energy swap that catches the crowd off guard in a positive way.

• 17:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 17:12

  Smooth transition between two high-energy tracks, maintaining the low-end drive.

• 24:12Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 24:12

  Strategic disruption

About this trap edm set

Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017 is a trap edm DJ set by Yellow Claw, running 57 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

The DJ uses their voice as a primary tool for tension management, creating a unique and highly engaging performance.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 26 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 929.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Methodology and limitations

This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

Questions about this analysis

What score does Yellow Claw's Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017 get?

Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017 scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Yellow Claw @ EDC Las Vegas 2017?

The analysed recording runs 57 min.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.