What score does Ghastly's GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET) get?

GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET) scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET)?

The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 79/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Ghastly

Ghastly — GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET)

Bass House · 1h 00m · EDC · analysed 23 Aug 2026

Overall score

82/100

Level

club ready

Duration

1h 00m

Genre

Bass House

About this bass house set

GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET) is a bass house DJ set by Ghastly, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 79/100.

The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 13 points, moving between 80 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 948.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%79

Beat Alignmentmeasured74

Transition Qualitymeasured70

Phrase Accuracymeasured90

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured60

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%88

Narrative ArcAI88

ProgressionAI85

Tension & ReleaseAI88

Section AwarenessAI88

Flow ContinuityAI85

PayoffAI97

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%84

Energy Curvemeasured84

PacingAI84

MomentumAI94

Peak ManagementAI91

Energy HandoffAI93

Fatigue ControlAI48

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%83

Unexpected MomentsAI87

ContrastAI79

Transition Varietymeasured93

Selection RiskAI88

FreshnessAI44

Surprise ControlAI87

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%90

Selection QualityAI89

Identity ConsistencyAI95

IntentionalityAI94

ConfidenceAI96

RestraintAI71

SignatureAI93

Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 85.

Energy arc

24:0060:00

Transitions analysed (9)

0:45

Intro Drop

strategic_disruption

100

2:15

Double Drop

5:12

Genre Switch

intentional_reset

100

9:48

Vocal Layering

12:34

Perfect Drop Swap

intentional_reset

100

16:22

Minor Gain Mismatch

20:15

Seamless Genre Switch

strategic_disruption

100

25:12

High-pass filter sweep with rhythmic cut

Precise transition that maintains the aggressive energy of the intro phase.

28:45

EQ-based layering with mid-range swap

Smooth integration of two high-energy tracks, creating a dense wall of sound.

Technical subscores

EQ balance

Beat alignment

Energy control

Tempo stability

Loudness control

Musical coherence

Harmonic compatibility

Transition cleanliness

Measured (DSP)

25.2 ms

Beat-grid drift (median)

182.3 ms

Drift p95

3,594

Boundaries detected

102

Hard cuts / h

Clipping events

760

Level jumps

Measurement confidence 98% · analysed on the full audio.

Recurring patterns

Long static loops (3×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:15, 48:00, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

Timeline

27:20Energy Peak

Coaching notes

Continue to refine gain staging during rapid genre shifts.
Experiment with more complex layering during melodic breakdowns.
Explore even more diverse genre fusions to further distinguish the Ghengar identity.

Listen on SoundCloud

Curious how your own set scores?

Questions about this analysis

What score does Ghastly's GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET) get?: GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET) scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
How long is GHENGAR || EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 (FULL SET)?: The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.
Which part of the mix scores best?: IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 79/100.
How is this score calculated?: SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

More Ghastly sets analysed

Similar bass house sets

All Ghastly analyses