SOONOS

    Paula TemplePaula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13

    Hard Techno · 1h 13m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    88/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 13m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Paula Temple.

    In short

    Paula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13 by Paula Temple scores 88/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (85/100).

    This is techno as a functional, industrial tool—precise, heavy, and undeniably effective.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 18:00, 22:00, 43:00, 48:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:25Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 2:25

      Seamless integration of new drum patterns over the existing industrial loop.

    • 5:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 5:12

      Smooth transition between two high-pressure industrial tracks using precise mid-range control.

    • 8:05Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 8:05

      Excellent use of layering to peak the energy before a subtle rhythmic shift.

    • 13:30Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 13:30

      Smooth transition focusing on high-hat and percussion handover.

    • 17:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:15

      Tracks coexist for a significant period, creating a new composite groove.

    About this hard techno set

    Paula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13 is a hard techno DJ set by Paula Temple, running 1h 13m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This is techno as a functional, industrial tool—precise, heavy, and undeniably effective.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 23 points, moving between 75 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1160.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 14 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This is techno as a functional, industrial tool—precise, heavy, and undeniably effective.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%89
    Beat Alignmentmeasured89
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI93
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI94

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured86
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI91
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI48

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI50
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI88
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    0:0061:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:25

    Long percussive blend

    Seamless integration of new drum patterns over the existing industrial loop.

    90
    5:12

    EQ-based texture swap

    Smooth transition between two high-pressure industrial tracks using precise mid-range control.

    88
    8:05

    Layered build-up

    Excellent use of layering to peak the energy before a subtle rhythmic shift.

    92
    13:30

    EQ-based textural blend

    Smooth transition focusing on high-hat and percussion handover.

    90
    17:15

    Long layering blend

    Tracks coexist for a significant period, creating a new composite groove.

    88
    25:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:40

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    94

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    14 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    219 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,345

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    30

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    18

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    46

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 18:00, 22:00, 43:00, 48:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Textural Shift
    • 10:15Groove Lock
    • 16:45Tension Peak
    • 21:30Groove Lock
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Paula Temple's Paula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13 get?
    Paula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13 scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Paula Temple at Tresor Berlin (Female:Pressure #1) 27 Sept 13?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 13m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Paula Temple sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Paula Temple analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.