SOONOS

    Paula TemplePaula Temple at Katharsis 2018

    Hard Techno · 1h 56m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    88/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 56m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Paula Temple.

    In short

    Paula Temple at Katharsis 2018 by Paula Temple scores 88/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (84/100).

    Noise is not the enemy of the groove; in the right hands, it is the groove's most powerful ally.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Sonic Identity
    • Energy Management
    • Technical Precision

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (18:00, 29:00, 33:00, 46:00, 52:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts to create rhythmic gaps.
    • Incorporate a few 'classic' industrial elements to provide nostalgia.
    • Use stereo width more aggressively during transitions.
    • Experiment with more extreme EQ carving to create space for new elements.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:15Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 4:15

      Perfectly timed drop that releases the built-up tension of the intro.

    • 13:00Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 13:00

      Seamless integration of two industrial loops; the transition is felt rather than heard.

    • 17:30Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 17:30

      Uses high-end frequencies to bridge the tracks, maintaining the energy floor.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:45

      Seamless integration of new industrial percussion over the existing wall of sound.

    • 27:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 27:15

      Perfectly timed bass handover that maintains absolute momentum.

    About this hard techno set

    Paula Temple at Katharsis 2018 is a hard techno DJ set by Paula Temple, running 1h 56m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Noise is not the enemy of the groove; in the right hands, it is the groove's most powerful ally.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 55 points, moving between 20 and 97 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 696.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Noise is not the enemy of the groove; in the right hands, it is the groove's most powerful ally.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured87
    Transition Qualitymeasured60
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI94
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI94

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%89
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI93
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI64

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%86
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI84
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI92
    FreshnessAI65
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI98
    ConfidenceAI98
    RestraintAI86
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    0:00115:52

    Transitions analysed (5)

    4:15

    Atmospheric fade into hard kick entry

    Perfectly timed drop that releases the built-up tension of the intro.

    95
    13:00

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Seamless integration of two industrial loops; the transition is felt rather than heard.

    92
    17:30

    High-pass filter sweep and layer

    Uses high-end frequencies to bridge the tracks, maintaining the energy floor.

    90
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless integration of new industrial percussion over the existing wall of sound.

    92
    27:15

    Surgical low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly timed bass handover that maintains absolute momentum.

    94

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    94

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    95

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    16 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    182 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,934

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    150

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    52

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    336

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (18:00, 29:00, 33:00, 46:00, 52:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Sonic Identity
    • Energy Management
    • Technical Precision

    Timeline

    • 0:05Atmospheric Hook
    • 6:12Kick Saturation
    • 4:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 15:45Textural Peak
    • 20:30Groove Lock
    • 25:50Rhythmic Peak
    • 29:40Atmospheric Shift

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts to create rhythmic gaps.
    • Incorporate a few 'classic' industrial elements to provide nostalgia.
    • Use stereo width more aggressively during transitions.
    • Experiment with more extreme EQ carving to create space for new elements.
    • Use silence or near-silence for 1-2 bars to reset the listener's ears.
    • Incorporate more varied rhythmic patterns to break the 4/4 monotony.
    • Continue exploring the boundaries of sonic saturation.
    • Experiment with more extreme stereo imaging for the noise layers.
    • Consider a brief moment of total silence to reset the crowd's ears before the final peak.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Paula Temple's Paula Temple at Katharsis 2018 get?
    Paula Temple at Katharsis 2018 scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Paula Temple at Katharsis 2018?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 56m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Paula Temple sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Paula Temple analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.