Charlotte de WitteCharlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023

    Hard Techno · 58 min · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    58 min
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    About this hard techno set

    Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 is a hard techno DJ set by Charlotte de Witte, running 58 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix is a testament to the power of uncompromising, driving techno in a festival setting.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 85/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 21 points, moving between 75 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 636.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 6 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This mix is a testament to the power of uncompromising, driving techno in a festival setting.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured60
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured71

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI93
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI97

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%91
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI94
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI83

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%88
    Unexpected MomentsAI85
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI90
    FreshnessAI86
    Surprise ControlAI85

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI83
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 90.

    Energy arc

    12:0046:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    6:30

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    10:45

    Seamless Phrase Swap

    100
    13:30

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap.

    Seamless transition maintaining the driving energy.

    92
    16:45

    Quick cut on the drop.

    High-impact transition that energizes the crowd.

    88
    24:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:05

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    93

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    6.3 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    181.2 ms

    Drift p95

    3,433

    Boundaries detected

    159

    Hard cuts / h

    0

    Clipping events

    178

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (4×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00, 29:00, 35:00, 39:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional energy management.
    • Technical precision in mixing.
    • Strong artistic identity.
    • Technical precision
    • Energy maintenance
    • Stylistic consistency

    Timeline

    • 18:20Masterful Buildup
    • 21:10Rhythmic Peak
    • 27:08Energy Surge

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to provide a moment of contrast.
    • Experiment with more syncopated percussion layers to add rhythmic depth.
    • Utilize high-pass filter sweeps more aggressively during builds for added tension.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Charlotte de Witte's Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 get?
    Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Charlotte de Witte at AMF Festival 2023?
    The analysed recording runs 58 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 85/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Charlotte de Witte sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    All Charlotte de Witte analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.