What score does Paula Temple's Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20 get?

Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20 scores 89/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20?

The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 87/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Paula Temple

Paula Temple — Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20

Hard Techno · 2h 00m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

89/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

2h 00m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Paula Temple.

In short

Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20 by Paula Temple scores 89/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (87/100).

This DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving industrial sculpture rather than a sequence of tracks.

Key takeaways

What worked

Exceptional technical precision in complex layering.
Strong, unmistakable artistic identity.
Masterful management of industrial tension.
Unmistakable artistic identity.

What weakened the set

Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 20:00, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00, 66:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Experiment with brief moments of total silence to create a 'vacuum' effect before a heavy drop.
Incorporate more varied high-frequency textures to keep the industrial soundscape fresh.
Consider a slightly more dramatic filter sweep to signal the transition between narrative chapters.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

2:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 2:15
Intentional reset
9:45Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 9:45
Strategic disruption
13:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 13:15
Seamless integration of new rhythmic elements, maintaining perfect phase.
18:50Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 18:50
Expertly managed transition between two dense industrial tracks.
29:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 29:45
Strategic disruption

About this hard techno set

Paula Temple - Essential Mix 2019-04-20 is a hard techno DJ set by Paula Temple, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 89/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

This DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving industrial sculpture rather than a sequence of tracks.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 87/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 34 points, moving between 30 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 583.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 8 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

This DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving industrial sculpture rather than a sequence of tracks.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%91

Beat Alignmentmeasured98

Transition Qualitymeasured88

Phrase Accuracymeasured94

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%93

Narrative ArcAI96

ProgressionAI94

Tension & ReleaseAI90

Section AwarenessAI93

Flow ContinuityAI95

PayoffAI91

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%88

Energy Curvemeasured86

PacingAI94

MomentumAI93

Peak ManagementAI92

Energy HandoffAI93

Fatigue ControlAI55

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%87

Unexpected MomentsAI87

ContrastAI88

Transition Varietymeasured95

Selection RiskAI93

FreshnessAI56

Surprise ControlAI87

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%96

Selection QualityAI95

Identity ConsistencyAI99

IntentionalityAI97

ConfidenceAI97

RestraintAI89

SignatureAI97

Energy arc

12:00118:00

Transitions analysed (7)

2:15

Perfect Energy Handoff

intentional_reset

100

6:12

Minor EQ Overlap