SOONOS

    Paula TemplePaula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017

    Hard Techno · 1h 30m · Awakenings · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 30m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Paula Temple.

    In short

    Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017 by Paula Temple scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (21:10, 28:05).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (34:00, 42:00, 45:00, 49:00, 78:00, 84:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 5:42

      Masterful transition from ambient noise to a structured kick, maintaining all atmospheric tension.

    • 10:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 10:15

      Seamless introduction of high-hats and secondary percussion to increase momentum.

    • 12:48Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:48

      Expertly layered industrial loops; the transition is almost invisible as the groove evolves.

    • 17:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:15

      A high-energy switch that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    • 21:10Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 21:10

      Smooth transition into a more atmospheric section without losing the underlying pulse.

    • 23:35Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:35

      Seamless introduction of metallic percussion over the existing kick, creating a new rhythmic layer without losing momentum.

    • 28:05Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 28:05

      Clean handover of the low-end frequencies. A slight mid-range build-up is audible but fits the industrial aesthetic.

    About this hard techno set

    Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017 is a hard techno DJ set by Paula Temple, running 1h 30m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 30 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 542.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured76
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%94
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI95
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI96

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured86
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI93
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI42

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI41
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI85
    SignatureAI97

    Energy arc

    0:0089:42

    Transitions analysed (7)

    5:42

    Long textural blend into rhythmic foundation

    Masterful transition from ambient noise to a structured kick, maintaining all atmospheric tension.

    92
    10:15

    Percussive layering and EQ swap

    Seamless introduction of high-hats and secondary percussion to increase momentum.

    90
    12:48

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Expertly layered industrial loops; the transition is almost invisible as the groove evolves.

    92
    17:15

    Drop-swap on the phrase

    A high-energy switch that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    88
    21:10

    Layered EQ blend

    Smooth transition into a more atmospheric section without losing the underlying pulse.

    84
    23:35

    Long industrial texture blend

    Seamless introduction of metallic percussion over the existing kick, creating a new rhythmic layer without losing momentum.

    92
    28:05

    EQ-based frequency swap

    Clean handover of the low-end frequencies. A slight mid-range build-up is audible but fits the industrial aesthetic.

    84

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    82

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    139 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,364

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    55

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    23

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    64

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (21:10, 28:05).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (34:00, 42:00, 45:00, 49:00, 78:00, 84:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 5:15The First Impact
    • 8:30Groove Lock
    • 25:50Sonic Saturation Peak
    • 30:15Rhythmic Reset
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Paula Temple's Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017 get?
    Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Paula Temple at Awakenings Festival 2017?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 30m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Paula Temple sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Paula Temple analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.