Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Sven Väth

Sven Väth — Sven Vath - Live @ Awakenings Festival 2014 (Spaarnwoude, Amsterdam) - 28-06-2014

Classics · 1h 05m · Awakenings · analysed 18 Aug 2026

Overall score

86/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

1h 05m

Genre

Classics

About this classics set

Sven Vath - Live @ Awakenings Festival 2014 (Spaarnwoude, Amsterdam) - 28-06-2014 is a classics DJ set by Sven Väth, running 1h 05m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 28 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 177.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%84

Beat Alignmentmeasured78

Transition Qualitymeasured90

Phrase Accuracymeasured91

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured87

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured63

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%91

Narrative ArcAI94

ProgressionAI91

Tension & ReleaseAI86

Section AwarenessAI90

Flow ContinuityAI94

PayoffAI91

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%86

Energy Curvemeasured83

PacingAI93

MomentumAI95

Peak ManagementAI89

Energy HandoffAI91

Fatigue ControlAI50

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%83

Unexpected MomentsAI84

ContrastAI83

Transition Varietymeasured94

Selection RiskAI90

FreshnessAI50

Surprise ControlAI84

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%94

Selection QualityAI93

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI95

ConfidenceAI96

RestraintAI89

SignatureAI94

Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 88.

Energy arc

00:0063:30