Jamie JonesJamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014)

    Tech House · 2h 06m · Time Warp · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 06m
    Genre
    Tech House

    About this tech house set

    Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014) is a tech house DJ set by Jamie Jones, running 2h 06m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix demonstrates the power of a well-maintained groove and expert energy management in creating a compelling dancefloor experience.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 64 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 179.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 14 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This mix demonstrates the power of a well-maintained groove and expert energy management in creating a compelling dancefloor experience.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured89
    Transition Qualitymeasured72
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured63

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI87

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured80
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI58

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI84
    FreshnessAI56
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI91

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 86.

    Energy arc

    0:00125:49

    Transitions analysed (6)

    3:45

    Long EQ blend with bass swap

    Textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's low end is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    92
    7:20

    Mid-range layering

    Smooth transition, though a slight buildup in the 500Hz-1kHz range is audible for about 8 bars.

    85
    13:45

    Long EQ blend

    Seamless transition with perfect beatmatching and EQ management.

    92
    18:20

    EQ swap on phrase

    Precise EQ swap that maintains the momentum and energy of the mix.

    90
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook tech-house transition, perfectly transparent and maintaining the groove.

    92
    29:50

    Phrase-aligned cut with EQ adjustment

    Precise entry of the new track, perfectly timed with the musical phrase.

    90

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    14.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    59.6 ms

    Drift p95

    7,530

    Boundaries detected

    112

    Hard cuts / h

    145

    Clipping events

    707

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (11:00, 19:00, 32:00, 34:00, 38:45, 43:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Groove continuity
    • Pacing and momentum

    Timeline

    • 0:30Groove Establishment
    • 5:15Energy Lift
    • 15:30Tension Build
    • 21:45Energy Peak
    • 26:45Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more diverse melodic elements.
    • Incorporate more vocal hooks or recognizable samples.
    • Explore unconventional ways to build and release tension.
    • Continue to refine the use of effects during transitions.
    • Introduce more melodic variation to add emotional depth.
    • Experiment with more dramatic tension-release moments.
    • Use atmospheric elements to create brief resets in the energy arc.
    • Continue to refine your technical precision, as it is a major strength.
    • Experiment with more diverse melodic elements to add depth to your narrative.
    • Explore more creative ways to build and release tension for even greater impact.
    • Maintain your focus on groove continuity, as it is the heart of your style.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Jamie Jones's Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014) get?
    Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014) scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014)?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 06m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Jamie Jones sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    All Jamie Jones analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.