Jamie JonesBurning Man - Maxa Xaman - 2019

    Tech House · 2h 21m · Burning MAN · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 21m
    Genre
    Tech House

    About this tech house set

    Burning Man - Maxa Xaman - 2019 is a tech house DJ set by Jamie Jones, running 2h 21m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in the desert, the space between the notes is as important as the notes themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 52 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 101.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 26 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in the desert, the space between the notes is as important as the notes themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured72
    Transition Qualitymeasured80
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI90
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI80
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI77

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI81
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI57

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI86
    RestraintAI91
    SignatureAI88

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 84.

    Energy arc

    0:00141:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    5:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Masterful patience. The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the hypnotic desert groove.

    92
    10:15

    Mid-range layering and filter fade

    Smooth introduction of a new melodic motif while slowly filtering out the previous track's lead.

    85
    14:45

    64-bar organic blend with high-pass filtering

    A masterfully executed long blend where the incoming percussion replaces the outgoing groove almost imperceptibly.

    94
    20:30

    EQ-swap on the 1st beat of the phrase

    Clean low-end swap that maintains the momentum while introducing a more melodic bassline.

    91
    28:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A very patient transition that respects the phrasing of both tracks. The bass swap is almost imperceptible.

    88

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    83

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    90

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    25.9 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    33.9 ms

    Drift p95

    8,446

    Boundaries detected

    80

    Hard cuts / h

    230

    Clipping events

    463

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (16:00, 22:00, 31:00, 59:00, 65:00, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional track selection
    • Flawless technical execution
    • Deep emotional narrative

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 8:30Groove Lock
    • 18:20Vocal Atmosphere Entry
    • 22:45Melodic Peak
    • 26:15Vocal Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Use subtle high-pass filter sweeps to create tension during long blends.
    • Experiment with brief melodic stabs to break up long percussive plateaus.
    • Maintain the excellent gain staging observed in this segment.
    • Continue to prioritize long, transparent blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filter cuts to create micro-tensions before a phrase change.
    • Consider layering a subtle vocal sample to add a human element to the electronic textures.
    • Continue to prioritize long-form narrative over quick transitions.
    • Experiment with subtle live looping of vocal fragments to extend emotional peaks.
    • Use high-pass filters more aggressively during breakdowns to create more impact when the kick returns.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filtered breakdowns to create more dynamic tension.
    • Introduce a few more 'dry' percussive elements to contrast with the lush atmospheric pads.
    • Maintain this level of selection quality; the tracks are perfectly suited for the intended context.
    • Use subtle delay or reverb throws on percussion during long blends to add depth.
    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive high-pass filtering during transitions to create 'air'.
    • Consider a more distinct melodic 'hook' for the final track to leave a lasting impression.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Jamie Jones's Burning Man - Maxa Xaman - 2019 get?
    Burning Man - Maxa Xaman - 2019 scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Burning Man - Maxa Xaman - 2019?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 21m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Jamie Jones sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    All Jamie Jones analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.