Jamie JonesHot Robot Radio 247

    Tech House · 58 min · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    75/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    58 min
    Genre
    Tech House

    About this tech house set

    Hot Robot Radio 247 is a tech house DJ set by Jamie Jones, running 58 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 75/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands the power of the groove, maintaining a relentless rhythmic pressure that is both technically clean and highly danceable.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 22 points, moving between 40 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 189.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 7 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands the power of the groove, maintaining a relentless rhythmic pressure that is both technically clean and highly danceable.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%90
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%81
    Narrative ArcAI85
    ProgressionAI79
    Tension & ReleaseAI73
    Section AwarenessAI84
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%76
    Energy Curvemeasured68
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI78
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI60

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%71
    Unexpected MomentsAI70
    ContrastAI66
    Transition Varietymeasured88
    Selection RiskAI65
    FreshnessAI55
    Surprise ControlAI70

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%83
    Selection QualityAI79
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI82
    ConfidenceAI87
    RestraintAI74
    SignatureAI76

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 81.

    Energy arc

    00:0046:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    03:12

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filter transition

    Smooth introduction of the new percussive layer, perfectly phrase-aligned.

    90
    07:45

    Bass swap on the 32nd bar

    Clean handover of the low-end frequencies, preserving the groove momentum.

    88
    13:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:25

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    19:40

    Clean Phrase Swap

    100
    26:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, perfectly phrase-aligned with a seamless bass handover.

    90

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    83

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    7 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    72.2 ms

    Drift p95

    3,466

    Boundaries detected

    72

    Hard cuts / h

    26

    Clipping events

    159

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 23:00, 27:30, 35:00, 41:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 27:45Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
    • Experiment with more dramatic tension-release cycles using breakdowns.
    • Vary the percussive density to avoid listener fatigue over long periods.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Jamie Jones's Hot Robot Radio 247 get?
    Hot Robot Radio 247 scores 75/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Hot Robot Radio 247?
    The analysed recording runs 58 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Jamie Jones sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    All Jamie Jones analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.