Joseph CapriatiJoseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim

    Tech House · 2h 00m · Time Warp · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 00m
    Genre
    Tech House

    About this tech house set

    Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim is a tech house DJ set by Joseph Capriati, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 45 points, moving between 20 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 593.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured57
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI42

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI41
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI92

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 86.

    Energy arc

    0:00120:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

    90
    9:35

    Percussive layering

    Smooth introduction of new high-end elements to increase energy.

    88
    14:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    18:40

    Surgical Swap

    100
    22:25

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82
    26:45

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed transition where the new track's elements are introduced so subtly they feel like part of the original arrangement.

    95

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20.8 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    222.3 ms

    Drift p95

    7,186

    Boundaries detected

    370

    Hard cuts / h

    1982

    Clipping events

    774

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 36:00, 43:30, 60:00, 70:00, 94:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Atmospheric Intro
    • 2:15Kick Entry
    • 28:15Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Consider adding a few more 'surprise' elements in the mid-frequencies to keep the listener on edge.
    • The use of silence or filtered breakdowns could further enhance the impact of the rolling basslines.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Joseph Capriati's Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim get?
    Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Joseph Capriati sets analysed

    Similar tech house sets

    All Joseph Capriati analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.