Joseph Capriati — Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim
Tech House · 2h 00m · Time Warp · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Joseph Capriati.
In short
Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim by Joseph Capriati scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 36:00, 43:30, 60:00, 70:00, 94:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
- Consider adding a few more 'surprise' elements in the mid-frequencies to keep the listener on edge.
- The use of silence or filtered breakdowns could further enhance the impact of the rolling basslines.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.
Smooth introduction of new high-end elements to increase energy.
Strategic disruption
Perfectly executed transition where the new track's elements are introduced so subtly they feel like part of the original arrangement.
About this tech house set
Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim is a tech house DJ set by Joseph Capriati, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 45 points, moving between 20 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 593.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%83
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%90
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%80
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.
Percussive layering
Smooth introduction of new high-end elements to increase energy.
Perfect Blend
Surgical Swap
Minor Level Jump
strategic_disruption
Long EQ blend
Perfectly executed transition where the new track's elements are introduced so subtly they feel like part of the original arrangement.
Technical subscores
90
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
90
Energy control
96
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
91
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
21 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
222 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,186
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
370
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
1982
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
774
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 36:00, 43:30, 60:00, 70:00, 94:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:00Atmospheric Intro
- 2:15Kick Entry
- 28:15Groove Lock Peak
Coaching notes
- Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
- Consider adding a few more 'surprise' elements in the mid-frequencies to keep the listener on edge.
- The use of silence or filtered breakdowns could further enhance the impact of the rolling basslines.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Joseph Capriati's Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim get?
- Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Joseph Capriati @ Time Warp 2017 - Mannheim?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Joseph Capriati sets analysed
Similar tech house sets
- Mochakk — Mochakk @ Time Warp - Mannheim - 30 Years - 202484
- Indira Paganotto — INDIRA PAGANOTTO : TIME WARP 2025 @ Stage 1 Closing Set85
- Jamie Jones — Jamie Jones live at Time Warp Mannheim 201685
- Jamie Jones — Jamie Jones @ Time Warp Mannheim 2014 (05.04.2014)85
- Amelie Lens — Amelie Lens @ Time Warp 201986
- Nina Kraviz — @ time warp march 202682
- Indira Paganotto — Indira Paganotto: Time Warp 30 years 2024 FULL SET86
- Loco Dice — LOCO DICE. Time Warp 201886
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research