SOONOS

    SlanderSLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018

    Melodic Dubstep · 1h 09m · EDC · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    82/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 09m
    Genre
    Melodic Dubstep

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Slander.

    In short

    SLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018 by Slander scores 82/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    The use of cinematic elements in the intro and interludes significantly enhances the overall storytelling.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:45, 18:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Incorporate more subtle tempo shifts to enhance narrative depth.
    • Experiment with longer build-ups to increase anticipation.
    • Use brief moments of silence to make energy re-entries more impactful.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 2:15

      High-impact transition into the first major peak.

    • 12:48Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:48

      Perfectly timed alignment of two heavy bass tracks, creating a massive wall of sound.

    • 17:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 17:15

      Sharp, decisive transition that resets the groove without losing momentum.

    • 26:45Measured (DSP)64/100Listen at 26:45

      Strategic disruption

    About this melodic dubstep set

    SLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018 is a melodic dubstep DJ set by Slander, running 1h 09m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The use of cinematic elements in the intro and interludes significantly enhances the overall storytelling.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 22 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The use of cinematic elements in the intro and interludes significantly enhances the overall storytelling.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignment (estimated)measured90
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured79
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanliness (estimated)measured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI85
    Tension & ReleaseAI89
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI83
    PayoffAI96

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured87
    PacingAI82
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI39

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI25
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%88
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI71
    SignatureAI88

    Energy arc

    0:0057:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    2:15

    Drop Swap

    High-impact transition into the first major peak.

    92
    12:48

    Double-drop impact swap

    Perfectly timed alignment of two heavy bass tracks, creating a massive wall of sound.

    92
    17:15

    Hard cut on the snare

    Sharp, decisive transition that resets the groove without losing momentum.

    88
    23:35

    Perfect Energy Handoff

    100
    26:45

    Noticeable Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    64

    Technical subscores

    79

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    80

    Loudness control

    81

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:45, 18:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Cinematic Intro
    • 2:15First Major Drop
    • 26:45Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate more subtle tempo shifts to enhance narrative depth.
    • Experiment with longer build-ups to increase anticipation.
    • Use brief moments of silence to make energy re-entries more impactful.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Slander's SLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018 get?
    SLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018 scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is SLANDER @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2018?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 09m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Slander sets analysed

    Similar melodic dubstep sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Slander analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.