What score does Slander's SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET) get?

SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET) scores 74/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET)?

The analysed recording runs 1h 32m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Slander

Slander — SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET)

Melodic Dubstep · 1h 32m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

74/100

Level

solid

Duration

1h 32m

Genre

Melodic Dubstep

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Slander.

In short

SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET) by Slander scores 74/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).

This set demonstrates how to maintain extreme intensity while keeping the audience emotionally invested.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (17:45, 27:58).
Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (48:00, 56:00, 86:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Experiment with longer, 32-bar blends to build more subtle tension.
Use more varied percussion layers during breakdowns to maintain rhythmic interest.
Explore harmonic mixing more deeply to create smoother melodic transitions.
Incorporate more live-style elements or unique edits to enhance the 'Signature' feel.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

1:45Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 1:45
Strategic disruption
7:20Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 7:20
Intentional reset
10:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 10:15
Strategic disruption
13:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 13:30
Sharp, high-impact transition that perfectly aligns with the track's energy shift.
17:45Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 17:45
Smooth handover of melodic elements, maintaining the emotional atmosphere.
24:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:12
Perfectly timed energy transfer that catches the listener off guard in the best way.
27:58Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 27:58
Smooth transition from high energy into a cinematic atmosphere.

About this melodic dubstep set

SLANDER @ VIRTUAL VIBES 2020 (MEDUSA SET) is a melodic dubstep DJ set by Slander, running 1h 32m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 74/100 overall — solid.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

This set demonstrates how to maintain extreme intensity while keeping the audience emotionally invested.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.

The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 60 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1144.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

This set demonstrates how to maintain extreme intensity while keeping the audience emotionally invested.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%80

Beat Alignmentmeasured65

Transition Qualitymeasured68

Phrase Accuracymeasured91

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%90

Narrative ArcAI89

ProgressionAI88

Tension & ReleaseAI92

Section AwarenessAI89

Flow ContinuityAI85

PayoffAI96

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%87

Energy Curvemeasured90

PacingAI86

MomentumAI93

Peak ManagementAI92

Energy HandoffAI92

Fatigue ControlAI60

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%82

Unexpected MomentsAI82

ContrastAI82

Transition Varietymeasured91

Selection RiskAI86

FreshnessAI59

Surprise ControlAI82

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%90

Selection QualityAI89

Identity ConsistencyAI95

IntentionalityAI93

ConfidenceAI94

RestraintAI75

SignatureAI92

Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 86.

Energy arc

12:0092:00

Transitions analysed (8)

1:45

Perfect Drop Swap

strategic_disruption

100

4:45

Minor Level Jump