What score does Dabin's DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK get?

DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK?

The analysed recording runs 1h 28m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Dabin

Dabin — DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK

Melodic Dubstep · 1h 28m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

Overall score

85/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

1h 28m

Genre

Melodic Dubstep

About this melodic dubstep set

DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK is a melodic dubstep DJ set by Dabin, running 1h 28m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 998.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%86

Beat Alignmentmeasured77

Transition Qualitymeasured82

Phrase Accuracymeasured92

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%92

Narrative ArcAI91

ProgressionAI90

Tension & ReleaseAI92

Section AwarenessAI92

Flow ContinuityAI88

PayoffAI97

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%87

Energy Curvemeasured92

PacingAI88

MomentumAI94

Peak ManagementAI94

Energy HandoffAI93

Fatigue ControlAI42

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%83

Unexpected MomentsAI86

ContrastAI86

Transition Varietymeasured93

Selection RiskAI88

FreshnessAI38

Surprise ControlAI86

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%91

Selection QualityAI91

Identity ConsistencyAI95

IntentionalityAI93

ConfidenceAI95

RestraintAI80

SignatureAI92

Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 88.

Energy arc

0:0088:00

Transitions analysed (8)

2:15

Cinematic buildup to drop switch

Perfectly timed release of tension, transitioning from orchestral elements to heavy bass.

5:22

EQ-balanced vocal blend

Smooth transition back into melodic territory, maintaining energy while shifting mood.

12:14

Perfect Impact Swap

strategic_disruption

100

14:20

Minor EQ Overlap

17:35

Cinematic Build Handoff

intentional_reset

100

20:12

Slight Level Jump

23:15

Perfect Melodic Blend

100

26:20

Minor Level Jump

strategic_disruption

Technical subscores

EQ balance

Beat alignment

Energy control

Tempo stability

Loudness control

Musical coherence

Harmonic compatibility

Transition cleanliness

Measured (DSP)

23.4 ms

Beat-grid drift (median)

216.5 ms

Drift p95

5,285

Boundaries detected

Hard cuts / h

Clipping events

233

Level jumps

Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.

Recurring patterns

Long static loops (2×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:45, 73:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

Timeline

0:05Atmospheric Hook
7:45Tension Plateau
5:22Risky pressure or vibe dip

Coaching notes

Incorporate more subtle atmospheric layers during breakdowns to enhance the cinematic feel.
Experiment with tempo-synced FX during transitions to add a unique technical signature.
Use brief moments of silence or extreme filtering to create more dramatic tension resets.
Ensure the sub-bass levels are perfectly balanced during the most complex layering sections.
Experiment with live guitar elements during the final melodic anthem for added texture.
Slightly extend the atmospheric breakdown at 80:00 to heighten the impact of the final drop.
Ensure vocal levels are consistently balanced against the heavy synth layers in the final chorus.

Listen on SoundCloud

Curious how your own set scores?

Questions about this analysis

What score does Dabin's DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK get?: DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
How long is DABIN - AURA PARK LIVE @ LOS ANGELES EXPOSITION PARK?: The analysed recording runs 1h 28m.
Which part of the mix scores best?: STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
How is this score calculated?: SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

More Dabin sets analysed

All Dabin analyses