Luke SlaterLuke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 2010

    Detroit Techno · 1h 29m · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 29m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    About this detroit techno set

    Luke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 2010 is a detroit techno DJ set by Luke Slater, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 29 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 235.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured80
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured78

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI94
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI93

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI21

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI87
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured97
    Selection RiskAI94
    FreshnessAI19
    Surprise ControlAI87

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI98
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    00:0077:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    03:05

    Long percussive blend

    Masterful introduction of a new rhythmic layer that feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    92
    05:45

    Manual vinyl adjustment

    A slight audible drift in the beats, likely a manual vinyl correction. It adds to the 'live' feel without breaking the groove.

    78
    12:12

    Minor Drift

    82
    16:25

    Perfect Blend

    intentional_reset

    100
    20:10

    EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    64
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Expertly executed handover of the sub-frequencies, maintaining the rolling momentum.

    92
    29:00

    Layered percussion transition

    Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements that gradually take over the groove.

    85

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    82

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    102.2 ms

    Drift p95

    5,299

    Boundaries detected

    35

    Hard cuts / h

    12

    Clipping events

    77

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 7:30, 24:00, 33:00, 38:00, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 02:15Groove Lock
    • 09:50Tension Peak
    • 05:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 20:10Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:30Groove Lock Peak
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Luke Slater's Luke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 2010 get?
    Luke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 2010 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Luke Slater @ Rockit Festival, Utrecht - NL, 31 July 2010?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Luke Slater sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    All Luke Slater analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.