Luke SlaterLuke Slater - Live @ Fuse - Brussels (1999)

    Detroit Techno · 2h 18m · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 18m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    About this detroit techno set

    Luke Slater - Live @ Fuse - Brussels (1999) is a detroit techno DJ set by Luke Slater, running 2h 18m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 49 points, moving between 40 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 733.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured86
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured72

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%93
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI93
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI94

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI96
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI94
    Fatigue ControlAI44

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI86
    ContrastAI82
    Transition Varietymeasured96
    Selection RiskAI93
    FreshnessAI42
    Surprise ControlAI86

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI96
    Identity ConsistencyAI99
    IntentionalityAI98
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI97

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    0:00137:37

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:12

    Vinyl blend with EQ overlap

    Slight phase drift audible, but the energy transfer is seamless.

    78
    8:30

    Percussive layering

    Masterful addition of a new rhythmic layer that enhances the existing groove.

    92
    12:48

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly timed bass handover that maintains the rolling momentum.

    90
    17:15

    Fast layering / Cut-in

    Aggressive but effective entry of a new rhythmic element.

    85
    23:45

    Fast percussive blend

    A quick, energetic swap that maintains the driving momentum.

    82
    28:00

    Long percussive overlap

    Masterful layering of two tracks to create a new, more intense groove.

    90

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    84

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    86

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    78

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    23 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    199.6 ms

    Drift p95

    8,239

    Boundaries detected

    31

    Hard cuts / h

    72

    Clipping events

    719

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (25:00, 29:00, 33:00, 40:00, 46:00, 50:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Groove Lock
    • 6:45Tension Peak
    • 4:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:15Percussive Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a brief breakdown around the 40-minute mark to provide a 'reset' for the ears.
    • Monitor the high-frequency accumulation when layering multiple tracks with open hi-hats.
    • Experiment with subtle delay on the percussion to add more depth to the industrial atmosphere.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Luke Slater's Luke Slater - Live @ Fuse - Brussels (1999) get?
    Luke Slater - Live @ Fuse - Brussels (1999) scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Luke Slater - Live @ Fuse - Brussels (1999)?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 18m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Luke Slater sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    All Luke Slater analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.