Luke SlaterDownload: CLR Podcast 175 - July 12 :: Recorded at fabric, London

    Detroit Techno · 1h 54m · Fabric London · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 54m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    About this detroit techno set

    Download: CLR Podcast 175 - July 12 :: Recorded at fabric, London is a detroit techno DJ set by Luke Slater, running 1h 54m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in hypnotic techno, the groove is the story.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 63 points, moving between 40 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 142.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in hypnotic techno, the groove is the story.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured84
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured71

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI85

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured80
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI69

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI65
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI93
    SignatureAI90

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 87.

    Energy arc

    0:00113:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly executed transition that maintains the hypnotic flow while introducing a new percussive drive.

    92
    9:45

    Seamless layering of rhythmic elements

    A very smooth transition that deepens the groove without any audible disruption to the energy.

    90
    12:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic flow perfectly.

    94
    17:20

    Percussive layering and mid-range swap

    Expertly timed entry of new rhythmic elements.

    92
    24:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition; the two tracks merge into a single groove.

    95
    27:45

    Mid-frequency layering

    Smooth introduction of new percussive elements without cluttering the mix.

    92

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    18.2 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    41.3 ms

    Drift p95

    6,820

    Boundaries detected

    73

    Hard cuts / h

    70

    Clipping events

    104

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 19:00, 30:00, 34:00, 40:56, 49:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:00Atmospheric Immersion
    • 6:20Groove Lock
    • 14:30Groove Lock
    • 21:15Peak Tension
    • 27:45Groove Lock Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is professional-grade.
    • Experiment with very subtle atmospheric pads to add a layer of depth to the industrial sound.
    • Consider a brief 'breather' or breakdown around the 30-minute mark to reset the energy for the next hour.
    • Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to provide a 'reset' for the listener's ears.
    • Experiment with subtle delay throws on percussive elements to add spatial depth.
    • Consider a slightly more aggressive EQ cut on the outgoing track to make the new elements pop more.
    • Maintain the current level of restraint; it is your greatest strength in this style.
    • Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts to create rhythmic 'holes' in the mix.
    • Use delay throws on percussive elements to add depth during transitions.
    • Consider a slightly faster BPM increase to push the energy toward the end of the segment.
    • Maintain the long blend technique; it is your strongest asset.
    • Monitor the 8kHz-12kHz range during dense layering to avoid harshness.
    • Consider a 'reset' track in the next 15 minutes to prepare for the final peak.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Luke Slater's Download: CLR Podcast 175 - July 12 :: Recorded at fabric, London get?
    Download: CLR Podcast 175 - July 12 :: Recorded at fabric, London scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Download: CLR Podcast 175 - July 12 :: Recorded at fabric, London?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 54m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Luke Slater sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    All Luke Slater analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.