Function — LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL

    Detroit Techno · 1h 60m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 60m
    Genre
    Detroit Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Function.

    In short

    LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL by Function scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    This mix demonstrates that true energy in techno comes from the relentless evolution of a groove rather than obvious drops.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (22:00, 26:00, 31:00, 36:00, 42:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is world-class.
    • Consider a slightly more aggressive rhythmic shift around the 30-minute mark to prevent potential monotony.
    • Experiment with very brief, high-pass filtered breakdowns to accentuate the re-entry of the sub-bass.
    • Continue to master the art of the long blend, as it is a core strength of this style.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:15Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 5:15

      A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass replaces the outgoing one so smoothly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    • 9:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 9:45

      Excellent use of layering to increase energy. The transition is used as a tool to build tension rather than just a bridge.

    • 25:30Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 25:30

      Flawless integration of two tracks; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    About this detroit techno set

    LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL is a detroit techno DJ set by Function, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix demonstrates that true energy in techno comes from the relentless evolution of a groove rather than obvious drops.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 46 points, moving between 20 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 349.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 2 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This mix demonstrates that true energy in techno comes from the relentless evolution of a groove rather than obvious drops.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured66
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI83

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured80
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI70

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI84
    FreshnessAI67
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI91

    Energy arc

    0:00119:36

    Transitions analysed (5)

    5:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end crossover

    A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The incoming track's sub-bass replaces the outgoing one so smoothly it feels like a single evolving piece.

    95
    9:45

    Percussive layering and high-pass filter sweep

    Excellent use of layering to increase energy. The transition is used as a tool to build tension rather than just a bridge.

    92
    13:15

    Transition

    100
    19:50

    Transition

    100
    25:30

    Long EQ blend with low-end handover

    Flawless integration of two tracks; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    95

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    2 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    140 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,158

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    128

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    153

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    401

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (22:00, 26:00, 31:00, 36:00, 42:00, 48:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05Atmospheric Hook
    • 10:20Groove Lock
    • 15:50Tension Peak
    • 21:30Atmospheric Shift
    • 28:15Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is world-class.
    • Consider a slightly more aggressive rhythmic shift around the 30-minute mark to prevent potential monotony.
    • Experiment with very brief, high-pass filtered breakdowns to accentuate the re-entry of the sub-bass.
    • Continue to master the art of the long blend, as it is a core strength of this style.
    • Experiment with more varied industrial textures to add further depth to the atmosphere.
    • Consider introducing very subtle melodic elements to create moments of emotional release.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter sweeps during long transitions.
    • Introduce a unique, non-percussive sound element to create a memorable 'hook'.
    • Slightly vary the kick drum texture between tracks to add subtle rhythmic interest.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Function's LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL get?
    LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is LASTER MIX #031 · FUNCTION & NASTIA REIGEL?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Function sets analysed

    Similar detroit techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Function analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.