Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #6

    Trap EDM · 54 min · analysed 26 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    54 min
    Genre
    Trap EDM

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Yellow Claw.

    In short

    Yellow Claw - #6 by Yellow Claw scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (79/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (5:30, 28:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 01:28Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 01:28

      Perfectly timed transition from the piano intro into the main groove. The 'Yellow Claw' tag acts as the bridge.

    • 05:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 05:12

      Smooth energy handoff between two high-intensity tracks. The percussion remains locked.

    • 19:05Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 19:05

      Strategic disruption

    • 23:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 23:12

      Sharp transition that maintains the hype without losing the beat.

    • 27:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 27:45

      Perfectly timed drop that combines elements of both tracks for maximum impact.

    About this trap edm set

    Yellow Claw - #6 is a trap edm DJ set by Yellow Claw, running 54 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 13 points, moving between 20 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 804.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured80
    Transition Qualitymeasured58
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured82
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI85
    ProgressionAI83
    Tension & ReleaseAI87
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI81
    PayoffAI95

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%81
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI84
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI36

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI25
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI68
    SignatureAI95

    Energy arc

    00:0032:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    01:28

    Cinematic drop-cut with vocal tag

    Perfectly timed transition from the piano intro into the main groove. The 'Yellow Claw' tag acts as the bridge.

    94
    05:12

    High-pass filter sweep and rhythmic swap

    Smooth energy handoff between two high-intensity tracks. The percussion remains locked.

    88
    12:15

    Perfect Impact Cut

    100
    16:20

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    19:05

    Seamless Genre Switch

    strategic_disruption

    100
    23:12

    Fast cut with vocal echo

    Sharp transition that maintains the hype without losing the beat.

    88
    27:45

    Double drop layering

    Perfectly timed drop that combines elements of both tracks for maximum impact.

    92

    Technical subscores

    82

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    80

    Harmonic compatibility

    85

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    209 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,237

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    148

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    54

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    315

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (2×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (5:30, 28:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 01:30The Drop
    • 07:45Tension Peak
    • 01:28Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 25:20Energy Peak
    • 29:50Vocal Layering
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Yellow Claw's Yellow Claw - #6 get?
    Yellow Claw - #6 scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Yellow Claw - #6?
    The analysed recording runs 54 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Yellow Claw sets analysed

    Similar trap edm sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Yellow Claw analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.