Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - #5

    Trap EDM · 53 min · analysed 26 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    79/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    53 min
    Genre
    Trap EDM

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Yellow Claw.

    In short

    Yellow Claw - #5 by Yellow Claw scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 1:15

      Strategic disruption

    • 5:45Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 5:45

      Intentional reset

    • 11:42Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 11:42

      Sharp transition into a new bassline, perfectly timed with the phrase.

    • 15:08Measured (DSP)68/100Listen at 15:08

      Slight mid-range clash between two vocal layers before the swap.

    • 24:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 24:12

      Intentional reset

    About this trap edm set

    Yellow Claw - #5 is a trap edm DJ set by Yellow Claw, running 53 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 7 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1020.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured68
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured79
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI85
    ProgressionAI81
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI83
    Flow ContinuityAI82
    PayoffAI94

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%80
    Energy Curvemeasured75
    PacingAI82
    MomentumAI90
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI44

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%77
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI84
    FreshnessAI43
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%88
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI65
    SignatureAI88

    Energy arc

    0:0011:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    1:15

    Perfect Drop Swap

    strategic_disruption

    100
    4:20

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    5:45

    Seamless Genre Shift

    intentional_reset

    100
    8:30

    Slight Level Jump

    82
    11:42

    Quick cut on the drop

    Sharp transition into a new bassline, perfectly timed with the phrase.

    82
    15:08

    EQ blend during breakdown

    Slight mid-range clash between two vocal layers before the swap.

    68
    21:45

    Perfect Phrasing

    100
    24:12

    Minor Level Jump

    intentional_reset

    82
    28:00

    Clean Drop Swap

    100

    Technical subscores

    79

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    81

    Loudness control

    78

    Musical coherence

    77

    Harmonic compatibility

    82

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    21 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    218 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,183

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    96

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    30

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    249

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Timeline

    • 13:15Energy Peak
    • 17:40Momentum Sag
    • 15:08Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Yellow Claw's Yellow Claw - #5 get?
    Yellow Claw - #5 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Yellow Claw - #5?
    The analysed recording runs 53 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Yellow Claw sets analysed

    Similar trap edm sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Yellow Claw analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.