Rebekah — Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23
Hard Techno · 1h 14m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Rebekah.
In short
Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23 by Rebekah scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (76/100).
Mastery in this genre isn't just about speed; it's about the surgical control of noise.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Rhythmic precision at high BPM
- Atmospheric consistency
- EQ management of distorted textures
What weakened the set
- Recurring high-end harshness (2×) — Hi-hat/cymbal stacking causes ear fatigue and crowd disengagement. Detected 2× (16:45, 26:20).
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 23:00, 27:00, 31:00, 49:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Continue refining the use of industrial textures to create depth.
- Explore more dissonant melodic elements to enhance the dark atmosphere.
- Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in this segment.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Surgical removal of the outgoing kick while the new industrial loop takes over. Seamless energy transfer.
Smooth introduction of vocal elements. The transition adds complexity without cluttering the mix.
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the percussive momentum without any energy dip.
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element over 16 bars before the full swap.
Expertly layered industrial textures; the transition is almost imperceptible as the new rhythmic lead takes over.
Solid technical transition. A slight build-up in the high-mids was managed well before the full swap.
Uses the energy of the outgoing track to propel the listener into the next track's atmospheric intro.
About this hard techno set
Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23 is a hard techno DJ set by Rebekah, running 1h 14m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Mastery in this genre isn't just about speed; it's about the surgical control of noise.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 76/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 80 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 553.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Mastery in this genre isn't just about speed; it's about the surgical control of noise.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%76
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%91
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%86
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%93
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 85.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Fast EQ swap with high-pass filter
Surgical removal of the outgoing kick while the new industrial loop takes over. Seamless energy transfer.
Layered blend over 16 bars
Smooth introduction of vocal elements. The transition adds complexity without cluttering the mix.
Fast EQ swap on the 1st beat of the phrase
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the percussive momentum without any energy dip.
Long percussive blend with high-pass filter work
Smooth integration of a new rhythmic element over 16 bars before the full swap.
Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering
Expertly layered industrial textures; the transition is almost imperceptible as the new rhythmic lead takes over.
EQ swap on the 32nd bar
Solid technical transition. A slight build-up in the high-mids was managed well before the full swap.
Filter-driven transition into a breakdown
Uses the energy of the outgoing track to propel the listener into the next track's atmospheric intro.
Technical subscores
85
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
91
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
76
Harmonic compatibility
86
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
329 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,429
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
138
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
0
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
292
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Recurring high-end harshness
Hi-hat/cymbal stacking causes ear fatigue and crowd disengagement. Detected 2× (16:45, 26:20).
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 23:00, 27:00, 31:00, 49:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Rhythmic precision at high BPM
- Atmospheric consistency
- EQ management of distorted textures
Timeline
- 06:15Atmospheric Reset
- 09:50Vocal Peak
- 14:50Industrial Peak
- 18:20Tension Release
- 24:30Peak Energy Lock
- 29:15Tension Modulation
Coaching notes
- Continue refining the use of industrial textures to create depth.
- Explore more dissonant melodic elements to enhance the dark atmosphere.
- Maintain the high level of technical precision shown in this segment.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Rebekah's Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23 get?
- Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23 scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Rebekah @ PRSPCT Rotterdam 2/12/23?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 14m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 76/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Rebekah sets analysed
Similar hard techno sets
- VTSS — VTSS 🗿 mix at Alien Jams / NTS Radio80
- Clara Cuvé — Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019)80
- Blawan — N SKA @ Smolna: Blawan | WarmUp Set80
- Clara Cuvé — Talk Tech To Me Set - 14.9.25 - Clara Cuve81
- Paula Temple — Paula Temple Live at R&S 30 years party London 11 Oct 201379
- Klangkuenstler — STYXX pres. Klangkuenstler x VJ Heymes (Set)81
- VTSS — NTS Radio x Unsound : VTSS, RRRKRTA, Wiktor Milczarek [Brutaż]81
- Clara Cuvé — Jacy Moon Recorded Live @ Bloom - Clara Cuvé Warm Up78
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research