Rebekah — Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20
Hard Techno · 59 min · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Rebekah.
In short
Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20 by Rebekah scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).
Your ability to maintain a relentless groove while layering complex industrial textures is a hallmark of a world-class techno DJ.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 16:00, 20:00, 30:00, 35:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to emphasize the re-entry of the kick.
- Use more extreme filter sweeps to create dynamic movement within static loops.
- Incorporate occasional non-rhythmic elements to add narrative depth.
- Continue exploring dense layering to maintain your signature energy.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Strategic disruption
Smooth transition maintaining the driving rhythm; the new percussive elements are introduced seamlessly.
Effective use of filtering to bring in new high-frequency energy without cluttering the mix.
Smooth introduction of new hats, perfectly phase-aligned.
A quick transition that slightly crowds the mid-frequencies for 2 bars.
About this hard techno set
Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20 is a hard techno DJ set by Rebekah, running 59 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Your ability to maintain a relentless groove while layering complex industrial textures is a hallmark of a world-class techno DJ.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 21 points, moving between 75 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 594.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Your ability to maintain a relentless groove while layering complex industrial textures is a hallmark of a world-class techno DJ.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%80
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%90
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%81
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%93
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Perfect Blend
Minor Level Jump
strategic_disruption
Seamless Percussive Swap
EQ-based blend with low-end swap
Smooth transition maintaining the driving rhythm; the new percussive elements are introduced seamlessly.
Fast layering with high-pass filtering
Effective use of filtering to bring in new high-frequency energy without cluttering the mix.
Percussive layering with high-pass filter
Smooth introduction of new hats, perfectly phase-aligned.
Fast EQ swap on the drop
A quick transition that slightly crowds the mid-frequencies for 2 bars.
Technical subscores
85
EQ balance
91
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
93
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
80
Harmonic compatibility
86
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
18 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
196 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,495
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
160
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
12
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
221
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 16:00, 20:00, 30:00, 35:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 16:50Rhythmic Peak
- 20:15Tension Plateau
- 27:32Risky pressure or vibe dip
Coaching notes
- Experiment with brief moments of silence to emphasize the re-entry of the kick.
- Use more extreme filter sweeps to create dynamic movement within static loops.
- Incorporate occasional non-rhythmic elements to add narrative depth.
- Continue exploring dense layering to maintain your signature energy.
- Experiment with brief, high-contrast breakdowns to reset the audience's ears.
- Monitor high-frequency saturation during peak energy moments.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Rebekah's Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20 get?
- Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Rebekah @ United We Stream & Griessmuehle 22.03.20?
- The analysed recording runs 59 min.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Rebekah sets analysed
Similar hard techno sets
- Klangkuenstler — Klangkuenstler - home session | Involve Records & Friends84
- SPFDJ — SPFDJ at HÖR /// April 2 /// 6pm - 7pm84
- Clara Cuvé — (Increased volume)Clara Cuvé | Boiler Room x Bónusz Festival84
- FJAAK — FJAAK - SECTION. - 20/05/2684
- Clara Cuvé — Podcast 135 // Clara Cuvé84
- Clara Cuvé — CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival84
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry - Awakenings Festival 202584
- SPFDJ — SPFDJ - BOOK ME FOR YOUR CLUB84
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research