Clara Cuvé — Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019)

    Hard Techno · 1h 45m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 45m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Clara Cuvé.

    In short

    Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019) by Clara Cuvé scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (75/100).

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision
    • Energy management
    • Style consistency

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:25, 10:12).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 35:00, 39:00, 52:00, 93:00, 103:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce occasional melodic motifs to provide emotional relief from the industrial drive.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter sweeps during transitions to enhance the 'build' feel.
    • Monitor high-frequency levels when layering multiple tracks with prominent hats to avoid harshness.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:25Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 02:25

      Smooth integration of the incoming track's hats before swapping the kick.

    • 06:25Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 06:25

      Effective energy handoff, though the incoming track is slightly louder.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)75/100Listen at 10:12

      Slight frequency masking in the mids for 4 bars before the outgoing track is cut.

    About this hard techno set

    Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019) is a hard techno DJ set by Clara Cuvé, running 1h 45m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 75/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 39 points, moving between 75 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1308.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured76
    Transition Qualitymeasured70
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI78
    Section AwarenessAI83
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%80
    Energy Curvemeasured76
    PacingAI83
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI43

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%75
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI71
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI37
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%88
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI74
    SignatureAI88

    Energy arc

    00:00105:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    02:25

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Smooth integration of the incoming track's hats before swapping the kick.

    88
    06:25

    Quick EQ swap on the drop

    Effective energy handoff, though the incoming track is slightly louder.

    82
    10:12

    Layered blend with mid-range overlap

    Slight frequency masking in the mids for 4 bars before the outgoing track is cut.

    75
    13:30

    Clean Blend

    100
    17:30

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    21:30

    Perfect Phrase Swap

    100
    23:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    27:28

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    83

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    83

    Musical coherence

    77

    Harmonic compatibility

    84

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    183 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,290

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    100

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    76

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    253

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:25, 10:12).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (4:00, 35:00, 39:00, 52:00, 93:00, 103:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Energy management
    • Style consistency

    Timeline

    • 04:45Groove Lock
    • 10:15Mid-Range Clutter
    • 10:12Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce occasional melodic motifs to provide emotional relief from the industrial drive.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter sweeps during transitions to enhance the 'build' feel.
    • Monitor high-frequency levels when layering multiple tracks with prominent hats to avoid harshness.
    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps.
    • Introduce subtle melodic elements for dark euphoria.
    • Ensure perfect level matching during dense blends.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Clara Cuvé's Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019) get?
    Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019) scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Clara Cuvé @ Rote Sonne, Munich (08.06.2019)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 45m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 75/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Clara Cuvé sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Clara Cuvé analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.