SOONOS

    Pole FolderPole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2

    Melodic Techno · 1h 46m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    82/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 46m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Pole Folder.

    In short

    Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2 by Pole Folder scores 82/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    True mastery is found in the silence between the beats and the patience of the blend.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:30, 21:00, 24:00, 30:00, 42:30, 59:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create dynamic rhythmic variations.
    • Incorporate more recognizable melodic hooks to enhance crowd connection.
    • Use subtle FX like delays and reverbs to further deepen the atmospheric layers.
    • Consider a brief energy reset to make the subsequent build feel more impactful.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 10:12

      Intentional reset

    • 13:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 13:15

      A very smooth transition that maintains the atmospheric tension while introducing a new rhythmic element.

    • 19:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 19:45

      Effective use of filtering to create space for the incoming track's melodic elements.

    • 29:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 29:12

      A textbook progressive blend where the incoming track's percussion emerges naturally from the outgoing atmosphere.

    About this melodic techno set

    Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2 is a melodic techno DJ set by Pole Folder, running 1h 46m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    True mastery is found in the silence between the beats and the patience of the blend.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 50 points, moving between 60 and 86 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 228.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    True mastery is found in the silence between the beats and the patience of the blend.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured86
    Transition Qualitymeasured87
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI86
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI83
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI69

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI67
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI88
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI87

    Energy arc

    12:00104:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    5:45

    Invisible Blend

    100
    10:12

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    13:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A very smooth transition that maintains the atmospheric tension while introducing a new rhythmic element.

    88
    19:45

    Layered blend with high-pass filter sweep

    Effective use of filtering to create space for the incoming track's melodic elements.

    85
    29:12

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    A textbook progressive blend where the incoming track's percussion emerges naturally from the outgoing atmosphere.

    94

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    90

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    16 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    158 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,338

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    27

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    32

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    135

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:30, 21:00, 24:00, 30:00, 42:30, 59:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:45Atmospheric Peak
    • 21:30Rhythmic Shift

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more aggressive EQ cuts to create dynamic rhythmic variations.
    • Incorporate more recognizable melodic hooks to enhance crowd connection.
    • Use subtle FX like delays and reverbs to further deepen the atmospheric layers.
    • Consider a brief energy reset to make the subsequent build feel more impactful.
    • Continue to leverage long blends to maintain the hypnotic state.
    • Consider using subtle delay effects on percussive elements to add depth.
    • Ensure the low-end remains clean during the longest overlaps.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Pole Folder's Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2 get?
    Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2 scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Pole Folder-Brussels 11.10.2014-Part 2?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 46m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Pole Folder sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Pole Folder analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.