SOONOS

    Pole FolderHoutbaar Haarlem - July 2025

    Melodic Techno · 1h 60m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    73/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 60m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Pole Folder.

    In short

    Houtbaar Haarlem - July 2025 by Pole Folder scores 73/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (86/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is just as important as the beats themselves.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision in long blends
    • Consistent and compelling mood
    • Excellent groove continuity

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 14:00, 27:30, 62:00, 70:00, 84:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Incorporate subtle vocal snippets or field recordings to add organic character.
    • Experiment with brief, intentional silences or 'reset' moments to heighten the impact of the re-entry.
    • Use more aggressive filtering on the master or individual channels to create temporary tension peaks.
    • Introduce more melodic elements to create a stronger emotional narrative.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 6:12

      Flawless transition, the new kick replaces the old one without any phase issues or volume dip.

    • 10:45Measured (DSP)84/100Listen at 10:45

      Smooth introduction of new percussive elements using high-pass filtering to avoid clutter.

    • 25:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 25:12

      Smooth transition with perfect phrase alignment and seamless energy transfer.

    About this melodic techno set

    Houtbaar Haarlem - July 2025 is a melodic techno DJ set by Pole Folder, running 1h 60m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 73/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is just as important as the beats themselves.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 86/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 49 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 450.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is just as important as the beats themselves.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured86
    Transition Qualitymeasured81
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%79
    Narrative ArcAI83
    ProgressionAI78
    Tension & ReleaseAI74
    Section AwarenessAI80
    Flow ContinuityAI86
    PayoffAI76

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%75
    Energy Curvemeasured71
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI73
    Energy HandoffAI79
    Fatigue ControlAI57

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI71
    ContrastAI73
    Transition Varietymeasured86
    Selection RiskAI64
    FreshnessAI57
    Surprise ControlAI71

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%81
    Selection QualityAI78
    Identity ConsistencyAI92
    IntentionalityAI79
    ConfidenceAI82
    RestraintAI80
    SignatureAI70

    Energy arc

    0:00119:30

    Transitions analysed (6)

    6:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Flawless transition, the new kick replaces the old one without any phase issues or volume dip.

    92
    10:45

    Filter sweep and percussive layering

    Smooth introduction of new percussive elements using high-pass filtering to avoid clutter.

    84
    13:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    18:40

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    23:00

    Seamless Handover

    100
    25:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition with perfect phrase alignment and seamless energy transfer.

    88

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    81

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    83

    Loudness control

    84

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    16 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    231 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,152

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    30

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    103

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    145

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 14:00, 27:30, 62:00, 70:00, 84:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision in long blends
    • Consistent and compelling mood
    • Excellent groove continuity

    Timeline

    • 4:20Groove Entry
    • 9:30Hypnotic Peak
    • 27:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate subtle vocal snippets or field recordings to add organic character.
    • Experiment with brief, intentional silences or 'reset' moments to heighten the impact of the re-entry.
    • Use more aggressive filtering on the master or individual channels to create temporary tension peaks.
    • Introduce more melodic elements to create a stronger emotional narrative.
    • Experiment with more dramatic energy shifts to avoid plateaus.
    • Use creative transition techniques like looping and filtering to add more personality to the mix.
    • Incorporate tracks with recognizable hooks to increase crowd engagement.
    • Experiment with subtle FX layering (reverb/delay) during the final transition to enhance the sense of space.
    • Use a slightly more aggressive high-pass filter sweep at 112:00 to create a sharper peak before the melodic drop.
    • Consider a 'hidden' final track—a brief ambient piece—to fully ground the audience after the techno groove stops.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Pole Folder's Houtbaar Haarlem - July 2025 get?
    Houtbaar Haarlem - July 2025 scores 73/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Houtbaar Haarlem - July 2025?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 60m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 86/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Pole Folder sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Pole Folder analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.