KlangkuenstlerSET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War

    Hard Techno · 1h 34m · analysed 23 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    77/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 34m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    About this hard techno set

    SET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War is a hard techno DJ set by Klangkuenstler, running 1h 34m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 77/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in Schranz, the kick is not just a beat, but a physical weapon.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 83/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 41 points, moving between 40 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 388.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 2 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in Schranz, the kick is not just a beat, but a physical weapon.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured62
    Phrase Accuracymeasured85
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured74
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%83
    Narrative ArcAI85
    ProgressionAI83
    Tension & ReleaseAI77
    Section AwarenessAI81
    Flow ContinuityAI85
    PayoffAI88

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%77
    Energy Curvemeasured73
    PacingAI71
    MomentumAI90
    Peak ManagementAI80
    Energy HandoffAI86
    Fatigue ControlAI58

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI72
    ContrastAI65
    Transition Varietymeasured88
    Selection RiskAI69
    FreshnessAI56
    Surprise ControlAI72

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%82
    Selection QualityAI83
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI84
    ConfidenceAI89
    RestraintAI50
    SignatureAI81

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 80.

    Energy arc

    00:0093:59

    Transitions analysed (7)

    02:25

    EQ swap on 16-bar phrase

    Solid percussive handover, maintaining momentum.

    85
    04:45

    Fast fader swap

    Audible EQ overlap in the mid-range for 2 bars.

    62
    12:34

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition into a more driving percussive track.

    85
    15:28

    Long blend with layering

    Excellent layering of percussive elements, enhancing the groove.

    90
    19:02

    Quick EQ swap

    Slightly abrupt mid-frequency jump, but energy is maintained.

    75
    21:55

    Filter sweep blend

    Effective use of high-pass filter to bring in the next track.

    88
    24:15

    EQ-heavy blend with kick overlap

    The incoming kick creates a slight phase cancellation in the low-end for about 4 bars.

    68

    Technical subscores

    74

    EQ balance

    85

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    79

    Loudness control

    82

    Musical coherence

    69

    Harmonic compatibility

    76

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    2 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    162.7 ms

    Drift p95

    5,622

    Boundaries detected

    255

    Hard cuts / h

    18

    Clipping events

    628

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (04:45, 19:02).

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (04:45, 24:15).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 6:00, 26:00, 32:00, 55:00, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 06:15Percussive Peak
    • 09:40Energy Plateau
    • 04:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 19:02Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:30Industrial Peak
    • 24:15Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Use more aggressive high-pass filtering during transitions to clean up the mid-range clutter.
    • Introduce brief melodic or atmospheric elements to provide contrast to the percussive wall.
    • Experiment with 'drop-swapping' (cutting the low end of both tracks and dropping the new kick) for higher impact.
    • Use more aggressive EQ carving in the low-mids to prevent mud during long blends.
    • Introduce subtle automation on percussion loops to maintain interest during high-energy plateaus.
    • Incorporate brief moments of silence or atmospheric breaks to reset the listener's ear.
    • Experiment with 'drop-swapping' kicks for a more instantaneous energy shift.
    • Use longer breakdowns to create more dramatic tension releases.
    • Sharpen EQ cuts during transitions to avoid mid-range frequency masking.
    • Experiment with rhythmic silence to reset the crowd's energy.
    • Introduce more varied textures in the mid-range to prevent monotony.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Klangkuenstler's SET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War get?
    SET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War scores 77/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is SET SCHRANZ - Nikolina / Kuko / Vendex / In Verruf / Luciid / Klangkuenstler / Cloudy / Noise Not War?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 34m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 83/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Klangkuenstler sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    All Klangkuenstler analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.