Kasia — LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024

    Hard Techno · 1h 24m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    75/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 24m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Kasia.

    In short

    LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024 by Kasia scores 75/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 60:00, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more dramatic EQ cuts during transitions to create 'air'.
    • Experiment with layering a melodic element in the final third of the set.
    • Vary the length of the builds to keep the crowd guessing.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 13:12Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 13:12

      Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

    • 17:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 17:45

      Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements over a 32-bar period.

    • 21:58Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 21:58

      Effective use of high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.

    • 26:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 26:15

      Perfectly executed handover. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one without any phase cancellation.

    About this hard techno set

    LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024 is a hard techno DJ set by Kasia, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 75/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 14 points, moving between 82 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 607.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured66
    Transition Qualitymeasured63
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured92
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured71

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI54

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI53
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI90
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI88

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 85.

    Energy arc

    24:0072:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    9:00

    Surgical Swap

    100
    13:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

    96
    17:45

    Layered percussive transition

    Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements over a 32-bar period.

    92
    21:58

    Filter-down transition into a fresh kick pattern

    Effective use of high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.

    89
    26:15

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filter swap

    Perfectly executed handover. The incoming kick replaces the outgoing one without any phase cancellation.

    94

    Technical subscores

    92

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    145 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,994

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    154

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    5

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    314

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (3×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:00, 60:00, 67:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:20Atmospheric Peak
    • 19:10Groove Lock
    • 28:10Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Use more dramatic EQ cuts during transitions to create 'air'.
    • Experiment with layering a melodic element in the final third of the set.
    • Vary the length of the builds to keep the crowd guessing.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Kasia's LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024 get?
    LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024 scores 75/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is LIVE AT MEGASTRUCTURE @ULTRA @RESISTANCE MIAMI MUSIC WEEK 2024?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Kasia sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Kasia analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.