TRYM — Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set
Hard Techno · 1h 01m · Tomorrowland · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, TRYM.
In short
Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set by TRYM scores 76/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (78/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Repeated volume jumps (2×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (05:12, 29:12).
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 21:30, 36:00, 39:30, 46:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition from cinematic intro into the first rhythmic element.
Aggressive swap into a harder kick; effective for energy but slightly jarring level jump.
Excellent phrasing, bringing the vocal in perfectly over the existing groove.
Clean handover of the low-end on the phrase change.
Perfectly timed energy handoff that catches the crowd at the peak of the riser.
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving momentum without any phase issues.
A slight volume dip during the blend, but it serves the narrative transition into the breakdown.
About this hard techno set
Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set is a hard techno DJ set by TRYM, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 76/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 78/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 20 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 926.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%78
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%91
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%86
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%83
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%91
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 85.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Atmospheric crossfade
Smooth transition from cinematic intro into the first rhythmic element.
High-pass filter cut
Aggressive swap into a harder kick; effective for energy but slightly jarring level jump.
Long blend with vocal layering
Excellent phrasing, bringing the vocal in perfectly over the existing groove.
EQ-based bass swap
Clean handover of the low-end on the phrase change.
Drop-swap with high-pass filter sweep
Perfectly timed energy handoff that catches the crowd at the peak of the riser.
Fast EQ swap on the 1st beat of the phrase
Perfectly timed transition that maintains the driving momentum without any phase issues.
Long melodic blend into breakdown
A slight volume dip during the blend, but it serves the narrative transition into the breakdown.
Technical subscores
84
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
95
Tempo stability
84
Loudness control
85
Musical coherence
84
Harmonic compatibility
85
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
193 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,631
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
190
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
10
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
234
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 99% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Repeated volume jumps
Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (05:12, 29:12).
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 21:30, 36:00, 39:30, 46:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 00:00Cinematic Intro
- 05:15Energy Explosion
- 09:10Vocal Peak
- 05:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 18:45Peak Energy Drop
- 22:15Melodic Respite
- 29:12Risky pressure or vibe dip
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does TRYM's Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set get?
- Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set scores 76/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Tomorrowland 2024 Trym Set?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 78/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More TRYM sets analysed
Similar hard techno sets
- Pan-Pot — PAN-POT Tomorrowland 201477
- Indira Paganotto — INDIRA PAGANOTTO: Tomorrowland @ Main Stage 2023 FULL SET77
- Dimitri Vegas — Dimitri Vegas - Live At Tomorrowland 2025 (VINYL ONLY)78
- Kevin de Vries — Kevin de Vries WE1 ｜ Tomorrowland 202473
- Yellow Claw — Yellow Claw - Tomorrowland Belgium 2018 Mainstage [Full Set]81
- Dimitri Vegas — Dimitri Vegas - Live At Tomorrowland 2024 (VINYL ONLY)81
- David Guetta — David Guetta – Live at Tomorrowland 2025 (Day 3 – Mainstage)71
- John Summit — John Summit Live @ Tomorrowland Freedom Stage 202581
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research