Dewalta — DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25

    Indie House · 2h 18m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 18m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Dewalta.

    In short

    DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25 by Dewalta scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    This DJ understands that in minimal techno, the transition is not a bridge between two tracks, but a third track in itself.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Exceptional EQ management during long blends.
    • Deep understanding of hypnotic groove construction.
    • Highly consistent and mature track selection.

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:20, 29:45).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:00, 20:00, 25:00, 31:00, 38:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision.
    • Experiment with brief atmospheric breakdowns to enhance the sense of space.
    • Consider a slightly more aggressive energy shift around the 20-minute mark.
    • Introduce a subtle melodic motif to break the percussive dominance.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 02:15

      Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    • 06:20Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 06:20

      Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements.

    • 18:40Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 18:40

      Intentional reset

    • 23:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:30

      A masterfully executed long blend where the incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like part of the original track.

    • 29:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 29:45

      A clean bass handover at the start of a new 32-bar phrase. The transition is smooth, though there's a very slight dip in the mids.

    About this indie house set

    DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25 is a indie house DJ set by Dewalta, running 2h 18m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in minimal techno, the transition is not a bridge between two tracks, but a third track in itself.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 72 points, moving between 10 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 203.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This DJ understands that in minimal techno, the transition is not a bridge between two tracks, but a third track in itself.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured65
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured62

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%83
    Energy Curvemeasured78
    PacingAI91
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI79
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI61
    Surprise ControlAI79

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI87

    Energy arc

    00:00138:15

    Transitions analysed (6)

    02:15

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    92
    06:20

    Percussive layering

    Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements.

    85
    14:20

    Perfect Blend

    100
    18:40

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    23:30

    Long EQ blend

    A masterfully executed long blend where the incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like part of the original track.

    92
    29:45

    Bass swap on phrase

    A clean bass handover at the start of a new 32-bar phrase. The transition is smooth, though there's a very slight dip in the mids.

    85

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    98 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    8,276

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    154

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    59

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    550

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (06:20, 29:45).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (7:00, 20:00, 25:00, 31:00, 38:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Exceptional EQ management during long blends.
    • Deep understanding of hypnotic groove construction.
    • Highly consistent and mature track selection.

    Timeline

    • 04:45Groove Lock
    • 09:12Subtle Energy Lift
    • 14:20Seamless Layering
    • 19:55Tension Peak
    • 26:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision.
    • Experiment with brief atmospheric breakdowns to enhance the sense of space.
    • Consider a slightly more aggressive energy shift around the 20-minute mark.
    • Introduce a subtle melodic motif to break the percussive dominance.
    • Experiment with a 'hard cut' to create a sudden energy shift.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to signal major chapter changes.
    • Use brief rhythmic silences to reset the dancefloor's ears.
    • Experiment with adding subtle atmospheric layers to enhance the emotional depth.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is world-class.
    • Continue to explore long, surgical blends as they are a clear strength.
    • Experiment with more varied melodic textures to add emotional depth.
    • Maintain the current level of restraint in energy management.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is a significant strength.
    • Experiment with slightly more diverse textural elements to further enrich the hypnotic state.
    • Consider a brief, high-contrast breakdown to reset the energy before a final peak.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision.
    • Experiment with subtle melodic shifts to enhance the emotional arc.
    • Use brief atmospheric breaks to create moments of tension and release.
    • Experiment with brief, high-impact silence to reset the hypnotic state.
    • Introduce a subtle melodic hook to provide a focal point for the listener.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision; it is a major strength.
    • Continue exploring the intersection of minimal techno and ambient textures for set closers.
    • Maintain the current level of EQ precision in long-form blends.
    • Consider introducing slightly more melodic variation in the mid-section to further enhance the emotional arc.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dewalta's DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25 get?
    DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25 scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is DEWALTA / Pingüino 21 / 05.06.25?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 18m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dewalta sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Dewalta analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.