Daniel AveryDaniel Avery 6 Mix (October 2013)

    Indie House · 2h 00m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 00m
    Genre
    Indie House

    About this indie house set

    Daniel Avery 6 Mix (October 2013) is a indie house DJ set by Daniel Avery, running 2h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This mix demonstrates that true energy comes from the tension between texture and rhythm, not just volume.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 10 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1003.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This mix demonstrates that true energy comes from the tension between texture and rhythm, not just volume.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured84
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI90
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI81

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured85
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI60

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%84
    Unexpected MomentsAI83
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI83

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI95
    SignatureAI95

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 88.

    Energy arc

    24:00120:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    5:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    10:12

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    13:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    18:40

    Textural Layering

    intentional_artistic

    100
    25:30

    Long EQ blend with subtle low-end swap

    A masterclass in transparency; the tracks merge so perfectly they sound like a single production.

    95

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19.7 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    198.8 ms

    Drift p95

    7,206

    Boundaries detected

    22

    Hard cuts / h

    98

    Clipping events

    389

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (26:00, 32:00, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00, 68:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 28:45Atmospheric Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Study the EQ handover at 112:10 as a reference for mood-shifting transitions.
    • Continue to prioritize narrative depth over constant peak-time energy.
    • Explore even more extreme dynamic ranges in future sets.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Daniel Avery's Daniel Avery 6 Mix (October 2013) get?
    Daniel Avery 6 Mix (October 2013) scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Daniel Avery 6 Mix (October 2013)?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 00m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Daniel Avery sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    All Daniel Avery analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.