What score does Dax J's DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019 get?

DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019?

The analysed recording runs 1h 58m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Dax J

Dax J — DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019

Hard Techno · 1h 58m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

Overall score

87/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

1h 58m

Genre

Hard Techno

About this hard techno set

DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019 is a hard techno DJ set by Dax J, running 1h 58m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

This segment exemplifies the power of industrial repetition to create a state of peak-time hypnosis.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 84/100.

The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 39 points, moving between 30 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 883.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 21 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

This segment exemplifies the power of industrial repetition to create a state of peak-time hypnosis.

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%84

Beat Alignmentmeasured80

Transition Qualitymeasured67

Phrase Accuracymeasured92

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%92

Narrative ArcAI94

ProgressionAI92

Tension & ReleaseAI89

Section AwarenessAI91

Flow ContinuityAI95

PayoffAI94

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%88

Energy Curvemeasured85

PacingAI92

MomentumAI96

Peak ManagementAI91

Energy HandoffAI94

Fatigue ControlAI56

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%85

Unexpected MomentsAI85

ContrastAI81

Transition Varietymeasured95

Selection RiskAI92

FreshnessAI57

Surprise ControlAI85

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%95

Selection QualityAI95

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI96

ConfidenceAI97

RestraintAI86

SignatureAI96

Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 88.

Energy arc

0:00118:00

Transitions analysed (6)

2:15

Atmospheric fade into kick entry

Perfectly timed introduction of the beat following the cinematic intro.

8:45

EQ blend with mid-range focus

Smooth transition between two driving tracks, maintaining the industrial grit.

13:30

Perfect Layering

intentional_reset

100

17:05

Minor EQ Overlap

21:20

Seamless Drive

strategic_disruption

100

26:12

Fast EQ swap on the 1

Perfectly timed transition that swaps the low-end energy without a single beat of hesitation.

Technical subscores

EQ balance

Beat alignment

Energy control

Tempo stability

Loudness control

Musical coherence

Harmonic compatibility

Transition cleanliness

Measured (DSP)

21.1 ms

Beat-grid drift (median)

219 ms

Drift p95

7,068

Boundaries detected

100

Hard cuts / h

Clipping events

245

Level jumps

Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

Recurring patterns

Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:00, 28:00, 47:00, 71:00, 77:00, 94:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

Timeline

0:45Atmospheric Hook
6:12Energy Surge
28:20Pressure Peak

Coaching notes

Maintain the high-velocity narrative while exploring slightly more varied rhythmic textures.
Experiment with brief moments of near-silence to enhance the impact of re-entries.
Incorporate subtle melodic fragments to add emotional depth to the industrial aggression.

Listen on SoundCloud

Curious how your own set scores?

Questions about this analysis

What score does Dax J's DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019 get?: DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019 scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
How long is DAX J @ REAKTOR 2019?: The analysed recording runs 1h 58m.
Which part of the mix scores best?: IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 84/100.
How is this score calculated?: SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

More Dax J sets analysed

Similar hard techno sets

All Dax J analyses