Dax JDax J @ CLR Warehouse Party London - 22 11 2012

    Hard Techno · 1h 32m · analysed 22 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    82/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 32m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    About this hard techno set

    Dax J @ CLR Warehouse Party London - 22 11 2012 is a hard techno DJ set by Dax J, running 1h 32m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This set demonstrates how a relentless groove can be more engaging than constant melodic drops.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 79/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 34 points, moving between 75 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 467.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This set demonstrates how a relentless groove can be more engaging than constant melodic drops.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured59
    Phrase Accuracymeasured88
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI90
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI88
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI45

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%79
    Unexpected MomentsAI79
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI43
    Surprise ControlAI79

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%92
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI93

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 84.

    Energy arc

    0:0092:26

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:45

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Seamless transition that maintains the driving energy without any phase issues.

    88
    8:00

    Long blend with high-pass filtering

    Smooth introduction of new elements while maintaining the hypnotic groove.

    85
    13:15

    Long percussive blend

    Smooth integration of hats, though the low-end gets slightly thick for 8 bars.

    75
    17:40

    EQ swap on phrase

    Precise low-end handover that maintains the momentum perfectly.

    82
    21:55

    Fast cut-in

    A bit abrupt; the energy shifts slightly too fast for the hypnotic state.

    68
    24:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    83

    EQ balance

    89

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    84

    Loudness control

    87

    Musical coherence

    76

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    22.8 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    199.5 ms

    Drift p95

    5,528

    Boundaries detected

    170

    Hard cuts / h

    66

    Clipping events

    273

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 10:00, 14:00, 18:00, 35:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Energy Lift
    • 10:20Tension Peak
    • 21:55Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to explore the intersection of industrial textures and rolling grooves.
    • Experiment with brief, high-contrast breakdowns to further emphasize the power of the kick.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision while pushing the boundaries of track selection.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dax J's Dax J @ CLR Warehouse Party London - 22 11 2012 get?
    Dax J @ CLR Warehouse Party London - 22 11 2012 scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Dax J @ CLR Warehouse Party London - 22 11 2012?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 32m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 79/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dax J sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    All Dax J analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.