Tchami — The Calling Mix Vol.1

    Future House · 50 min · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    74/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    50 min
    Genre
    Future House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Tchami.

    In short

    The Calling Mix Vol.1 by Tchami scores 74/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (79/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (71/100).

    Your ability to maintain a seamless groove is your greatest asset; now focus on telling a more complex emotional story.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision
    • Groove continuity
    • Energy management

    What weakened the set

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash (2×) — Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (7:12, 15:42).
    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 12:00, 18:00, 22:00, 26:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Introduce more melodic layers to enhance emotional depth.
    • Experiment with more creative transition effects like delays or reverb washes.
    • Vary the rhythmic structure occasionally to prevent groove fatigue.
    • Use longer breakdowns to build more dramatic tension.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:42Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 3:42

      Very smooth transition, the incoming bassline takes over perfectly on the phrase.

    • 7:12Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 7:12

      Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's melody while keeping the old kick.

    • 11:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 11:15

      Smooth transition with precise bass swap on the phrase boundary.

    • 15:42Measured (DSP)74/100Listen at 15:42

      Slightly abrupt energy shift, though beatmatch remains locked.

    • 21:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 21:15

      Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    • 25:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 25:45

      High-impact transition into a well-known vocal hook.

    About this future house set

    The Calling Mix Vol.1 is a future house DJ set by Tchami, running 50 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 74/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Your ability to maintain a seamless groove is your greatest asset; now focus on telling a more complex emotional story.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 79/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 70 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1398.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 27 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Your ability to maintain a seamless groove is your greatest asset; now focus on telling a more complex emotional story.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%77
    Beat Alignmentmeasured70
    Transition Qualitymeasured58
    Phrase Accuracymeasured85
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured81
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured90
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%77
    Narrative ArcAI77
    ProgressionAI77
    Tension & ReleaseAI71
    Section AwarenessAI77
    Flow ContinuityAI85
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%74
    Energy Curvemeasured68
    PacingAI72
    MomentumAI86
    Peak ManagementAI72
    Energy HandoffAI78
    Fatigue ControlAI64

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%71
    Unexpected MomentsAI69
    ContrastAI66
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI69
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI69

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%79
    Selection QualityAI78
    Identity ConsistencyAI90
    IntentionalityAI78
    ConfidenceAI83
    RestraintAI67
    SignatureAI69

    Energy arc

    0:0049:42

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:42

    EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, the incoming bassline takes over perfectly on the phrase.

    88
    7:12

    Vocal overlay and filter sweep

    Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's melody while keeping the old kick.

    82
    11:15

    32-bar EQ blend

    Smooth transition with precise bass swap on the phrase boundary.

    88
    15:42

    Quick cut with filter sweep

    Slightly abrupt energy shift, though beatmatch remains locked.

    74
    21:15

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    92
    25:45

    Phrase-aligned drop

    High-impact transition into a well-known vocal hook.

    90
    30:00

    Minor EQ overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    81

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    77

    Energy control

    90

    Tempo stability

    81

    Loudness control

    78

    Musical coherence

    79

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    27 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    210 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    2,966

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    142

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    260

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    214

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (7:12, 15:42).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 12:00, 18:00, 22:00, 26:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Groove continuity
    • Energy management

    Timeline

    • 0:45Energy Hook
    • 5:32Tension Peak
    • 13:20Groove Lock
    • 18:50Energy Plateau
    • 15:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:30Vocal Peak
    • 28:15Groove Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce more melodic layers to enhance emotional depth.
    • Experiment with more creative transition effects like delays or reverb washes.
    • Vary the rhythmic structure occasionally to prevent groove fatigue.
    • Use longer breakdowns to build more dramatic tension.
    • Introduce a melodic breakdown to create a more memorable emotional peak.
    • Experiment with shorter, more aggressive cuts to add variety to the long blends.
    • Use FX like delay or reverb to transition between tracks with different atmospheric textures.
    • Focus on developing a more unique track selection to build a stronger artistic identity.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Tchami's The Calling Mix Vol.1 get?
    The Calling Mix Vol.1 scores 74/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is The Calling Mix Vol.1?
    The analysed recording runs 50 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 79/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Tchami sets analysed

    Similar future house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Tchami analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.