Tchami — Tchami - Confessions #2
Future House · 1h 10m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Tchami.
In short
Tchami - Confessions #2 by Tchami scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (91/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).
This mix is a textbook example of how to build a strong sonic brand through consistent curation and execution.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 27:00, 33:00, 47:00, 55:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Vary transition lengths to add more narrative depth.
- Use more subtle EQ filtering during long blends to create evolving textures.
- Incorporate a 'surprise' genre shift to keep the audience on their toes.
- Introduce more dynamic range by using longer breakdowns.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove without any audible dip in energy.
Energetic transition that builds tension before a sharp cut into the next track.
Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.
Flawless integration of the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing bassline.
High-impact transition that swaps the energy profile instantly without losing the groove.
Smooth transition using the melodic elements of the incoming track to bridge the energy gap.
About this future house set
Tchami - Confessions #2 is a future house DJ set by Tchami, running 1h 10m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This mix is a textbook example of how to build a strong sonic brand through consistent curation and execution.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 33 points, moving between 60 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 696.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This mix is a textbook example of how to build a strong sonic brand through consistent curation and execution.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%83
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%86
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%83
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%80
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%91
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove without any audible dip in energy.
Fast layering and cut
Energetic transition that builds tension before a sharp cut into the next track.
Filter sweep and blend
Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.
Long EQ blend with high-pass filter transition
Flawless integration of the incoming track's percussion over the outgoing bassline.
Drop swap on the phrase
High-impact transition that swaps the energy profile instantly without losing the groove.
32-bar melodic blend
Smooth transition using the melodic elements of the incoming track to bridge the energy gap.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
Technical subscores
90
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
86
Energy control
96
Tempo stability
91
Loudness control
89
Musical coherence
88
Harmonic compatibility
92
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
24 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
236 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,170
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
103
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
559
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
329
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 27:00, 33:00, 47:00, 55:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 0:05Intro Hook
- 4:45Energy Peak
- 11:20Groove Lock
- 15:30Groove Lock
- 19:15Energy Peak
Coaching notes
- Vary transition lengths to add more narrative depth.
- Use more subtle EQ filtering during long blends to create evolving textures.
- Incorporate a 'surprise' genre shift to keep the audience on their toes.
- Introduce more dynamic range by using longer breakdowns.
- Experiment with more aggressive EQ filtering during transitions to add flair.
- Vary the rhythmic structure occasionally to prevent the groove from becoming too predictable.
- Experiment with shorter, more aggressive cuts to contrast the long blends.
- Use more mid-range EQ sculpting to give vocals more space in dense sections.
- Incorporate more non-musical elements (FX, atmosphere) to enhance the narrative.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Tchami's Tchami - Confessions #2 get?
- Tchami - Confessions #2 scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Tchami - Confessions #2?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 10m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Tchami sets analysed
Similar future house sets
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 09783
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 14683
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42982
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 16284
- Lucas & Steve — Lucas & Steve Radio 15282
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42582
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #42781
- Mike Williams — Mike Williams On Track #43481
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research