Tale of UsTale Of Us - Live @ Time Warp 2016 (Mannheim) - 03-04-2016

    Melodic Techno · 1h 57m · Time Warp · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    75/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 57m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    About this melodic techno set

    Tale Of Us - Live @ Time Warp 2016 (Mannheim) - 03-04-2016 is a melodic techno DJ set by Tale of Us, running 1h 57m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 75/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This segment demonstrates how technical perfection can be used to serve a deep, emotional narrative rather than just technical display.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100.

    The final score is capped by measured bm: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 47 points, moving between 30 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 251.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This segment demonstrates how technical perfection can be used to serve a deep, emotional narrative rather than just technical display.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured66
    Transition Qualitymeasured76
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured68

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI87

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%88
    Energy Curvemeasured92
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI56

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI87
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI56
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (bm) — weighted average was 88.

    Energy arc

    0:00116:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    6:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    10:12

    Atmospheric Layering

    100
    13:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Flawless transition, maintaining the deep atmospheric tension.

    95
    17:45

    Progressive layering and EQ filtering

    Smooth introduction of percussive elements to build energy.

    92
    21:30

    Harmonic blend with atmospheric pads

    Perfectly executed harmonic transition that enhances the emotional arc.

    94
    24:12

    Long EQ blend with subtle high-pass filtering.

    Invisible handover; the percussion of the incoming track perfectly complements the outgoing bassline.

    95
    29:12

    Harmonic blend over 32 bars.

    The melodic elements of both tracks harmonize perfectly, creating a lush soundscape.

    92

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    95

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    28.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    100.8 ms

    Drift p95

    7,030

    Boundaries detected

    98

    Hard cuts / h

    126

    Clipping events

    392

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 26:00, 32:00, 35:00, 40:00, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:20Atmospheric Peak
    • 19:10Groove Lock
    • 27:45Melodic Integration

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to master the art of the long, patient blend.
    • Experiment with even more complex melodic layering in the closing stages.
    • Maintain this level of narrative focus in all performance contexts.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Tale of Us's Tale Of Us - Live @ Time Warp 2016 (Mannheim) - 03-04-2016 get?
    Tale Of Us - Live @ Time Warp 2016 (Mannheim) - 03-04-2016 scores 75/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Tale Of Us - Live @ Time Warp 2016 (Mannheim) - 03-04-2016?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 57m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Tale of Us sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    All Tale of Us analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.