Superpitcher — Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4
Indie House · 1h 59m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Superpitcher.
In short
Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4 by Superpitcher scores 67/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (86/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (55/100).
This DJ understands that silence and space are as important as the kick drum in a spiritual context.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 4:00, 8:00, 48:00, 52:30, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Use subtle percussion layering to bridge transitions more actively.
- Monitor mid-frequency accumulation when layering multiple melodic instruments.
- Introduce more distinct 'reset' moments to refresh the listener's ear.
- Experiment with more dramatic EQ filtering to create artificial tension.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Transparent handover of mid-range frequencies; very professional.
Expertly executed blend that prioritizes the melodic handoff.
Smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic state.
A bit abrupt compared to previous blends; slight volume bump.
About this indie house set
Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4 is a indie house DJ set by Superpitcher, running 1h 59m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 67/100 overall — developing.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
This DJ understands that silence and space are as important as the kick drum in a spiritual context.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 86/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 55/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 48 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
5 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1982.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 75 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
This DJ understands that silence and space are as important as the kick drum in a spiritual context.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%55
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%79
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%77
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%73
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%86
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (5)
Long EQ blend
Transparent handover of mid-range frequencies; very professional.
Long EQ blend with high-pass swap
Expertly executed blend that prioritizes the melodic handoff.
Mid-frequency swap on phrase
Smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic state.
Direct EQ swap
A bit abrupt compared to previous blends; slight volume bump.
The Ghost Blend
Technical subscores
84
EQ balance
90
Beat alignment
78
Energy control
90
Tempo stability
81
Loudness control
84
Musical coherence
89
Harmonic compatibility
87
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
75 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
217 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,128
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
15
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
15
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
1380
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 98% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 4:00, 8:00, 48:00, 52:30, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 15:45Atmospheric Peak
- 22:50Gain Jump
- 22:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
Coaching notes
- Use subtle percussion layering to bridge transitions more actively.
- Monitor mid-frequency accumulation when layering multiple melodic instruments.
- Introduce more distinct 'reset' moments to refresh the listener's ear.
- Experiment with more dramatic EQ filtering to create artificial tension.
- Try layering a field recording (e.g., rain, city sounds) to add another layer of texture.
- Consider a 'hard cut' transition once in a while to surprise the listener.
- Incorporate more varied melodic elements to enhance the narrative journey.
- Experiment with longer breakdowns to create more dramatic release points.
- Add occasional vocal stabs to provide focal points for the crowd.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Superpitcher's Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4 get?
- Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4 scores 67/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Spiritual SundayZ Vol.4?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 59m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 86/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 55/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Superpitcher sets analysed
Similar indie house sets
- Four Tet — 1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014)67
- HAAi — TOM HAAI - GALERIA DE ARTES - 24/04/25 (Zara House)66
- Dixon — in our wilderness68
- Damian Lazarus — PM Scientists: DROP THE BEAT (Damian Lazarus & Zoe Richardson)68
- DJ Koze — In Focus: DJ Koze 30012170
- Raresh — Raresh Rush - Live at Private Party 31.12.202370
- DJ Koze — In Focus DJ Koze70
- Raresh — HALLOWEEN MUSIC MIX 2016 _ Best Trap, Dubstep, Electro, House, EDM Party Dance Mix64
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research