Dixonin our wilderness

    Indie House · 1h 05m · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    68/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 05m
    Genre
    Indie House

    About this indie house set

    in our wilderness is a indie house DJ set by Dixon, running 1h 05m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 68/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 85/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 71/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 10 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 890.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 14 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured89
    Transition Qualitymeasured86
    Phrase Accuracymeasured82
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured80
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured88
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured79

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%76
    Narrative ArcAI83
    ProgressionAI75
    Tension & ReleaseAI69
    Section AwarenessAI77
    Flow ContinuityAI83
    PayoffAI67

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%72
    Energy Curvemeasured76
    PacingAI73
    MomentumAI79
    Peak ManagementAI72
    Energy HandoffAI74
    Fatigue ControlAI48

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%71
    Unexpected MomentsAI67
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured86
    Selection RiskAI67
    FreshnessAI46
    Surprise ControlAI67

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%81
    Selection QualityAI79
    Identity ConsistencyAI91
    IntentionalityAI77
    ConfidenceAI79
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI77

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 77.

    Energy arc

    00:0054:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    06:42

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filter transition

    Masterful transition from ambient intro to the first rhythmic track. The percussion enters so naturally it feels like part of the original arrangement.

    92
    11:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, the organic percussion layers overlap perfectly.

    85
    16:20

    Mid-frequency focused blend

    Good management of melodic elements, though slightly crowded in the high-mids.

    78
    20:50

    Quick EQ swap

    A bit abrupt compared to previous blends; the energy dips slightly during the swap.

    65
    23:52

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    A very smooth transition where the incoming track's percussion gradually replaces the outgoing elements.

    88
    28:15

    Mid-frequency swap during a breakdown

    A slight level jump in the mids as the new synth line enters, causing a brief distraction.

    72

    Technical subscores

    80

    EQ balance

    87

    Beat alignment

    75

    Energy control

    88

    Tempo stability

    78

    Loudness control

    82

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    83

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    13.9 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    167.9 ms

    Drift p95

    3,878

    Boundaries detected

    10

    Hard cuts / h

    49

    Clipping events

    428

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (20:50, 28:15).

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 17:00, 24:00, 30:00, 32:00, 45:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 00:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 08:15Groove Lock
    • 20:50Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 28:15Risky pressure or vibe dip
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Dixon's in our wilderness get?
    in our wilderness scores 68/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is in our wilderness?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 05m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 85/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 71/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Dixon sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    All Dixon analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.