Four Tet1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014)

    Indie House · 1h 07m · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    67/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 07m
    Genre
    Indie House

    About this indie house set

    1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014) is a indie house DJ set by Four Tet, running 1h 07m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 67/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves, showing great technical maturity.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 65/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 24 points, moving between 65 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 510.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    This DJ understands that in techno, the space between the beats is as important as the beats themselves, showing great technical maturity.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured82
    Phrase Accuracymeasured80
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured78
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured87
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%72
    Narrative ArcAI76
    ProgressionAI72
    Tension & ReleaseAI65
    Section AwarenessAI71
    Flow ContinuityAI82
    PayoffAI68

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%68
    Energy Curvemeasured60
    PacingAI71
    MomentumAI81
    Peak ManagementAI64
    Energy HandoffAI73
    Fatigue ControlAI55

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%65
    Unexpected MomentsAI60
    ContrastAI67
    Transition Varietymeasured82
    Selection RiskAI58
    FreshnessAI50
    Surprise ControlAI60

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%76
    Selection QualityAI70
    Identity ConsistencyAI91
    IntentionalityAI73
    ConfidenceAI76
    RestraintAI77
    SignatureAI60

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 73.

    Energy arc

    0:0056:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:22

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition where the incoming kick replaces the outgoing one seamlessly on the phrase.

    82
    9:45

    High-pass filter transition

    Effective use of filtering to clear space for the next track's percussion.

    75
    15:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition, tracks are perfectly in phase. The percussive elements mesh well.

    85
    19:40

    Quick mid-range swap

    Slightly abrupt energy shift. The incoming track has a much brighter top end that wasn't fully compensated for.

    68
    24:15

    Long EQ blend

    Smooth transition with excellent frequency management.

    85
    28:40

    Quick EQ swap

    Slightly abrupt transition that causes a minor energy dip.

    72

    Technical subscores

    78

    EQ balance

    85

    Beat alignment

    75

    Energy control

    87

    Tempo stability

    78

    Loudness control

    76

    Musical coherence

    75

    Harmonic compatibility

    80

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19.5 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    224.8 ms

    Drift p95

    4,022

    Boundaries detected

    25

    Hard cuts / h

    96

    Clipping events

    207

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Recurring mid-frequency clash

      Mid-range buildup muddies the soundstage and washes out vocals/synths during transitions. Detected 2× (9:45, 28:40).

    • Repeated volume jumps

      Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (19:40, 28:40).

    • Slow recovery after transitions

      Long perceptual recovery means the energy line dips on every blend. Detected 3× (9:45, 19:40, 28:40).

    • Long static loops (1×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Groove Lock Established
    • 7:40Energy Plateau
    • 19:40Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:50Groove Lock
    • 30:15Energy Plateau
    • 28:40Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Increase dynamic range by using more dramatic EQ cuts before transitions.
    • Introduce melodic elements or vocal snippets to create 'anchor points' in the mix.
    • Experiment with shorter, more frequent transitions to increase the narrative pace.
    • Use FX like delay or reverb on percussion to add spatial depth to the industrial sound.
    • Use longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to build tension.
    • Introduce tracks with recognizable hooks to increase crowd engagement.
    • Vary the energy levels more significantly to create a more compelling narrative arc.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Four Tet's 1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014) get?
    1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014) scores 67/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is 1234567890qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm (DJ mix JAN 2014)?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 07m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 82/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 65/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Four Tet sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    All Four Tet analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.