Speedy JSpeedy J @ 909 Festival 2022 Amsterdam

    Experimental Techno · 2h 02m · analysed 19 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    87/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 02m
    Genre
    Experimental Techno

    About this experimental techno set

    Speedy J @ 909 Festival 2022 Amsterdam is a experimental techno DJ set by Speedy J, running 2h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Speedy J proves that true energy comes from the subtle layering of percussion rather than the volume of the drop.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 42 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 163.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 2 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    Speedy J proves that true energy comes from the subtle layering of percussion rather than the volume of the drop.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured98
    Transition Qualitymeasured65
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured92
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured74

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI95
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI89
    Section AwarenessAI92
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI59

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%85
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI90
    FreshnessAI58
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI93
    SignatureAI96

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 89.

    Energy arc

    0:0099:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    5:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Flawless integration of the new kick drum; the groove never wavers.

    95
    9:45

    High-pass filter transition with percussive layering

    Smooth transition into a more aggressive percussive section.

    92
    12:15

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    A masterfully executed transition where the new kick drum is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    95
    16:45

    EQ-based layering and subtraction

    Smooth transition focusing on high-frequency elements to shift the energy before the low-end swap.

    92
    21:10

    Double-drop layering

    High-energy moment where two tracks are layered to create a wall of sound before one is cut away.

    90
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless introduction of new percussive elements.

    96
    29:30

    Low-end swap on the 32nd bar

    Perfectly timed bass handover that maintains the drive.

    94

    Technical subscores

    92

    EQ balance

    96

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    93

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    2.1 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    55.9 ms

    Drift p95

    7,272

    Boundaries detected

    163

    Hard cuts / h

    44

    Clipping events

    260

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 30:00, 44:00, 52:00, 55:00, 63:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Seamless, morphing transitions.
    • Relentless, hypnotic groove continuity.
    • Expert management of industrial textures.

    Timeline

    • 5:12Seamless Handoff
    • 8:20Pressure Peak
    • 14:20Groove Lock
    • 19:30Tension Peak
    • 21:10Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 26:15Textural Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Introduce a brief atmospheric breakdown to reset the crowd's ears and make the next peak hit harder.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter sweeps during transitions to add a layer of performance drama.
    • Layer in some warmer, organic textures to provide a contrast to the dominant industrial sound.
    • Use longer reverb tails on percussive elements to create a greater sense of space in the mix.
    • Experiment with brief, high-pass filtered 'silence' moments (1-2 beats) to create even more impact on the re-entry.
    • Introduce a very subtle melodic element in the next segment to provide a narrative contrast to the industrial focus.
    • Monitor the mid-range frequencies during long blends to ensure maximum clarity in large festival systems.
    • Experiment with brief, high-contrast atmospheric resets.
    • Incorporate more varied rhythmic syncopation in the percussion layers.
    • Use vocal snippets sparingly to provide a human element to the industrial soundscape.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Speedy J's Speedy J @ 909 Festival 2022 Amsterdam get?
    Speedy J @ 909 Festival 2022 Amsterdam scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Speedy J @ 909 Festival 2022 Amsterdam?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Speedy J sets analysed

    Similar experimental techno sets

    All Speedy J analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.