What score does Speedy J's CLR podcast 217 Speedy J get?

CLR podcast 217 Speedy J scores 88/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is CLR podcast 217 Speedy J?

The analysed recording runs 1h 11m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 84/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Speedy J

Speedy J — CLR podcast 217 Speedy J

Experimental Techno · 1h 11m · analysed 19 Aug 2026

Overall score

88/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

1h 11m

Genre

Experimental Techno

About this experimental techno set

CLR podcast 217 Speedy J is a experimental techno DJ set by Speedy J, running 1h 11m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 88/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 84/100.

The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 19 points, moving between 75 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 79.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Technical precision0

Track selection0

Energy arc0

Crowd control0

Harmonic depth0

Groove patience0

Creativity0

Signature0

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%91

Beat Alignmentmeasured86

Transition Qualitymeasured90

Phrase Accuracymeasured96

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured93

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%93

Narrative ArcAI95

ProgressionAI92

Tension & ReleaseAI90

Section AwarenessAI93

Flow ContinuityAI96

PayoffAI88

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%85

Energy Curvemeasured81

PacingAI94

MomentumAI95

Peak ManagementAI90

Energy HandoffAI92

Fatigue ControlAI37

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%84

Unexpected MomentsAI87

ContrastAI85

Transition Varietymeasured96

Selection RiskAI91

FreshnessAI38

Surprise ControlAI87

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%96

Selection QualityAI95

Identity ConsistencyAI99

IntentionalityAI97

ConfidenceAI97

RestraintAI94

SignatureAI96

Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 90.

Energy arc

24:0059:00