Sonja Moonear — Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009

    Indie House · 2h 07m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    2h 07m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Sonja Moonear.

    In short

    Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009 by Sonja Moonear scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

    This segment demonstrates how power can be generated through the steady accumulation of rhythmic detail rather than raw volume.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision
    • Rhythmic restraint
    • Hypnotic flow

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 31:00, 46:00, 50:00, 81:00, 88:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Continue to explore the subtle interplay of percussive layers.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence to create more dramatic impact.
    • Maintain the high level of track selection and narrative flow.
    • Continue to explore the use of subtle melodic textures to add emotional depth.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 6:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 6:45

      A textbook minimal blend. The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    • 14:20Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 14:20

      A masterfully slow transition where the incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    • 19:00Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 19:00

      Clean bass handover that maintains the physical momentum without any audible dip in energy.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:45

      Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the percussive flow.

    • 29:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 29:15

      A very long blend that showcases the DJ's patience and control.

    About this indie house set

    Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009 is a indie house DJ set by Sonja Moonear, running 2h 07m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    This segment demonstrates how power can be generated through the steady accumulation of rhythmic detail rather than raw volume.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 39 points, moving between 60 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 238.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 16 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    This segment demonstrates how power can be generated through the steady accumulation of rhythmic detail rather than raw volume.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured87
    Transition Qualitymeasured88
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured89
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI88
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI82

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI91
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI61

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI83
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI60
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI94
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI95
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    0:00116:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    6:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    A textbook minimal blend. The transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    92
    14:20

    Extended EQ blend

    A masterfully slow transition where the incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    94
    19:00

    Low-end swap on phrase

    Clean bass handover that maintains the physical momentum without any audible dip in energy.

    90
    23:45

    Long EQ blend

    Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the percussive flow.

    92
    29:15

    Extended overlap

    A very long blend that showcases the DJ's patience and control.

    85

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    89

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    16 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    140 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,605

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    30

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    39

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    449

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 31:00, 46:00, 50:00, 81:00, 88:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision
    • Rhythmic restraint
    • Hypnotic flow

    Timeline

    • 4:15Groove Lock
    • 11:20Sonic Depth Increase
    • 16:45Hypnotic Peak
    • 20:30Energy Plateau
    • 27:30Groove Lock

    Coaching notes

    • Continue to explore the subtle interplay of percussive layers.
    • Experiment with brief moments of silence to create more dramatic impact.
    • Maintain the high level of track selection and narrative flow.
    • Continue to explore the use of subtle melodic textures to add emotional depth.
    • Experiment with brief rhythmic resets to create more dynamic tension and release.
    • Maintain the exceptional level of restraint in your long-form blends.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Sonja Moonear's Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009 get?
    Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Sonja Moonear @ Treibstoff-Klub SummerResidence Mai 2009?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 07m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Sonja Moonear sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Sonja Moonear analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.