Perc — Perc - Doom, Bogota

    Hard Techno · 1h 29m · analysed 25 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    60/100
    Level
    developing
    Duration
    1h 29m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Perc.

    In short

    Perc - Doom, Bogota by Perc scores 60/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (78/100).

    Perc demonstrates that industrial techno is not just about noise, but about the precise control of sonic pressure and rhythmic hypnosis.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 13:00, 19:00, 28:00, 32:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    What to try next

    • Use momentary silence to reset the dancefloor's ears before a major drop.
    • Experiment with layering non-percussive industrial textures (drones, noise) to add depth.
    • Vary the transition lengths to keep the listener guessing.
    • Monitor the high-end gain when layering multiple distorted tracks.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:22Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 4:22

      Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    • 7:50Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 7:50

      Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements before the full swap.

    • 12:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 12:45

      Expertly managed overlap of two dense industrial tracks. The transition is almost imperceptible due to perfect rhythmic alignment.

    • 17:20Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 17:20

      Solid technical execution. The bass swap is clean, though the incoming track has a slightly brighter top end that creates a minor energy jump.

    • 26:25Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 26:25

      Strategic disruption

    About this hard techno set

    Perc - Doom, Bogota is a hard techno DJ set by Perc, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 60/100 overall — developing.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Perc demonstrates that industrial techno is not just about noise, but about the precise control of sonic pressure and rhythmic hypnosis.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 78/100.

    The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 80 and 96 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 227.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Perc demonstrates that industrial techno is not just about noise, but about the precise control of sonic pressure and rhythmic hypnosis.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%78
    Beat Alignmentmeasured60
    Transition Qualitymeasured65
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%90
    Narrative ArcAI91
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI89
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI45

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI87
    FreshnessAI46
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%93
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI94

    Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 85.

    Energy arc

    0:0089:26

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:22

    EQ-matched long blend

    Perfectly executed handover of the low-end frequencies.

    92
    7:50

    Layered percussive blend

    Smooth integration of new rhythmic elements before the full swap.

    88
    12:45

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Expertly managed overlap of two dense industrial tracks. The transition is almost imperceptible due to perfect rhythmic alignment.

    88
    17:20

    EQ swap on the 1st beat of the phrase

    Solid technical execution. The bass swap is clean, though the incoming track has a slightly brighter top end that creates a minor energy jump.

    82
    22:30

    Perfect EQ Blend

    100
    26:25

    Minor High-End Clutter

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    77

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    30 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    98 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,348

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    182

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    41

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    330

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 13:00, 19:00, 28:00, 32:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    • Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms

      Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

    Timeline

    • 14:50Industrial Peak
    • 19:30Tension Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Use momentary silence to reset the dancefloor's ears before a major drop.
    • Experiment with layering non-percussive industrial textures (drones, noise) to add depth.
    • Vary the transition lengths to keep the listener guessing.
    • Monitor the high-end gain when layering multiple distorted tracks.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Perc's Perc - Doom, Bogota get?
    Perc - Doom, Bogota scores 60/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Perc - Doom, Bogota?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Perc analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.