What score does FJAAK's Puff Puff Pass #1 get?

Puff Puff Pass #1 scores 66/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Puff Puff Pass #1?

The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 77/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 62/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

FJAAK

FJAAK — Puff Puff Pass #1

Hard Techno · 1h 01m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

66/100

Level

developing

Duration

1h 01m

Genre

Hard Techno

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, FJAAK.

In short

Puff Puff Pass #1 by FJAAK scores 66/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (77/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (62/100).

You have mastered the 'groove lock'; now focus on the 'story' to elevate the set from functional to memorable.

Key takeaways

What worked

Technical precision in beatmatching and EQ.
Consistent rhythmic flow.
Excellent track selection for a club environment.

What weakened the set

Recurring low-end clash (2×) — Two basslines fighting in the sub kills club translation and creates phase mush. Detected 2× (2:25, 18:45).
Slow recovery after transitions (2×) — Long perceptual recovery means the energy line dips on every blend. Detected 2× (2:25, 8:05).
Long static loops (1×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (40:45). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Introduce more melodic or vocal elements to break the percussive monotony.
Use longer, more dramatic filter sweeps to enhance tension and release.
Experiment with 'double-dropping' or more aggressive EQ swaps to create surprise.
Vary the BPM slightly across the full set to evolve the energy.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

2:25Measured (DSP)55/100Listen at 2:25
Audible low-end clash for ~4 bars, creating a muddy texture before the swap.
8:05Measured (DSP)42/100Listen at 8:05
Jarring level jump and slight phrasing misalignment disrupts the groove.
14:12Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 14:12
Smooth integration of new percussion layers, very transparent.
18:45Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 18:45
Solid technical execution, though the vibe shift is very minimal.
22:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 22:30
Effective use of high-pass filter to build tension before dropping the new kick.
25:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:12
Perfectly executed handover; the groove never wavers.

About this hard techno set

Puff Puff Pass #1 is a hard techno DJ set by FJAAK, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 66/100 overall — developing.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

You have mastered the 'groove lock'; now focus on the 'story' to elevate the set from functional to memorable.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 77/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 62/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 34 points, moving between 30 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 556.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

You have mastered the 'groove lock'; now focus on the 'story' to elevate the set from functional to memorable.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%77

Beat Alignmentmeasured76

Transition Qualitymeasured69

Phrase Accuracymeasured79

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured74

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured86

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%72

Narrative ArcAI75

ProgressionAI70

Tension & ReleaseAI67

Section AwarenessAI71

Flow ContinuityAI79

PayoffAI70

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%65

Energy Curvemeasured58

PacingAI65

MomentumAI81

Peak ManagementAI65

Energy HandoffAI71

Fatigue ControlAI44

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%62

Unexpected MomentsAI60

ContrastAI64

Transition Varietymeasured80

Selection RiskAI56

FreshnessAI41

Surprise ControlAI60

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%73

Selection QualityAI70

Identity ConsistencyAI88

IntentionalityAI71

ConfidenceAI76

RestraintAI63

SignatureAI61

Energy arc

0:0060:50