Nina Kraviz@ neopop 2023

    Experimental Techno · 1h 55m · analysed 18 Aug 2026

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 55m
    Genre
    Experimental Techno

    About this experimental techno set

    @ neopop 2023 is a experimental techno DJ set by Nina Kraviz, running 1h 55m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's ability to maintain a relentless groove while subtly shifting textures is a hallmark of professional mastery.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 91/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    The final score is capped by measured -: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 49 points, moving between 10 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1044.1 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    TECSELNRGCRWHRMGRVCRESIG
    0

    The DJ's ability to maintain a relentless groove while subtly shifting textures is a hallmark of professional mastery.

    The 8 dimensions

    Technical precision0
    Track selection0
    Energy arc0
    Crowd control0
    Harmonic depth0
    Groove patience0
    Creativity0
    Signature0

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured64
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured55

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI93
    PayoffAI86

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI62

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI82
    FreshnessAI59
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%91
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI89
    SignatureAI87

    Final score capped by measured execution (-) — weighted average was 85.

    Energy arc

    12:00115:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    4:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    The transition is so smooth it feels like a single evolving track. The kick drum handover is flawless.

    95
    10:45

    High-pass filter layering

    Subtle introduction of new percussive elements. The DJ waits for the perfect phrase boundary.

    92
    14:05

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition; the tracks merge into a single, powerful groove.

    92
    17:00

    Subtle high-pass filter transition

    Smooth transition using filters to manage the energy handoff.

    85
    21:00

    EQ-based layering

    Expertly layered tracks create a rich, complex percussive landscape.

    88
    24:15

    Invisible Blend

    100
    28:30

    Percussive Layering

    100

    Technical subscores

    89

    EQ balance

    94

    Beat alignment

    90

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    91

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20.2 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    220.9 ms

    Drift p95

    6,890

    Boundaries detected

    112

    Hard cuts / h

    129

    Clipping events

    288

    Level jumps

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 69:00, 75:00, 81:00, 89:00, 92:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05Thematic Anchor
    • 6:30Groove Lock
    • 15:30Groove Lock
    • 19:45Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic energy resets to create bigger payoffs.
    • Incorporate more unique, signature sounds to build a stronger artistic identity.
    • Use vocal elements or field recordings to add a human touch to the industrial sound.
    • Introduce more micro-variations in the high-end percussion to prevent any hint of monotony.
    • Experiment with brief, 1-2 bar 'silences' to create sudden, high-impact re-entries.
    • Incorporate more subtle, evolving atmospheric pads to add emotional depth to the hypnotic groove.
    • Introduce a brief melodic breakdown to provide a moment of relief before the final peak.
    • Experiment with more aggressive filter modulation to add a layer of live performance energy.
    • Consider a subtle vocal element to create a more memorable 'hook' for the crowd.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension during long blends.
    • Experiment with short, rhythmic cuts to add surprise to the relentless groove.
    • Introduce a track with a strong melodic hook to create a memorable peak moment.
    • Ensure the master output has enough headroom to preserve the punch of the kicks.
    • Maintain this level of restraint; it is your greatest technical asset.
    • Explore slightly more aggressive mid-range EQ sculpting to enhance the industrial grit.
    • Consider a more dramatic 'silence' moment before the final track to reset the crowd's ears.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Nina Kraviz's @ neopop 2023 get?
    @ neopop 2023 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is @ neopop 2023?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 55m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 91/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Nina Kraviz sets analysed

    Similar experimental techno sets

    All Nina Kraviz analyses

    Drop your mix. Explore your session.

    No account. No setup. Instant analysis.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / M4A / OGG / FLAC — min 1 min, max 2048 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    A free account is required to run an analysis. Create your account

    Upload now. Create account later.