SOONOS

    Lilly PalmerLilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052

    Hard Techno · 1h 03m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 03m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lilly Palmer.

    In short

    Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052 by Lilly Palmer scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (80/100).

    The DJ's ability to maintain such high levels of pressure while keeping the groove locked is a testament to their professional maturity.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:30, 34:15, 39:00, 52:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to accentuate release points.
    • Consider a slightly longer 'breather' breakdown to make the next peak hit even harder.
    • Introduce more varied emotional textures to broaden the narrative arc.
    • Ensure the mastering doesn't clip during the most dense layering sections.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 2:15

      Smooth transition into a more driving bassline, maintaining energy perfectly.

    • 5:15Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 5:15

      Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's mid-range energy.

    • 7:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 7:45

      Flawless execution of a kick-drum handover, maintaining the physical drive.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 23:45

      Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    • 27:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 27:15

      Well-executed transition using filters to build tension before the swap.

    About this hard techno set

    Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052 is a hard techno DJ set by Lilly Palmer, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's ability to maintain such high levels of pressure while keeping the groove locked is a testament to their professional maturity.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 28 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 814.6 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's ability to maintain such high levels of pressure while keeping the groove locked is a testament to their professional maturity.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured74
    Transition Qualitymeasured60
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI87
    Tension & ReleaseAI83
    Section AwarenessAI87
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%87
    Energy Curvemeasured82
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI82

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%83
    Unexpected MomentsAI79
    ContrastAI80
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI86
    FreshnessAI78
    Surprise ControlAI79

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI77
    SignatureAI90

    Energy arc

    0:0062:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    2:15

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Smooth transition into a more driving bassline, maintaining energy perfectly.

    92
    5:15

    Layered transition with high-pass filter

    Effective use of filtering to bring in the new track's mid-range energy.

    90
    7:45

    Precise kick swap on the phrase

    Flawless execution of a kick-drum handover, maintaining the physical drive.

    94
    13:05

    Perfect Blend

    100
    17:22

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    20:15

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    23:45

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    88
    27:15

    EQ swap with filter sweep

    Well-executed transition using filters to build tension before the swap.

    85

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    83

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    25 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    182 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,753

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    183

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    3276

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    274

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (28:30, 34:15, 39:00, 52:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Energy Foundation
    • 4:30Tension Peak
    • 8:30Atmospheric Shift
    • 25:30Filter Tension Build
    • 29:45Peak Energy Drop

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to accentuate release points.
    • Consider a slightly longer 'breather' breakdown to make the next peak hit even harder.
    • Introduce more varied emotional textures to broaden the narrative arc.
    • Ensure the mastering doesn't clip during the most dense layering sections.
    • Experiment with more melodic contrast to add depth to the high-energy narrative.
    • Incorporate more vocal elements to further enhance crowd connection.
    • Use brief moments of silence to create even more dramatic pressure releases.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Lilly Palmer's Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052 get?
    Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #052?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Lilly Palmer sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Lilly Palmer analyses

    Drop your mix. See what happened.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Drop your set. We listen to it in full, like a human.

    MP3 / WAV / AIF / AIFF / FLAC — min 1 min, max 200 MB

    Up to 15 minutes for long sets — coffee recommended ☕

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.

    Upload without an account. Create your free verified DJ profile to unlock the complete report.