Lilly Palmer — Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023
Hard Techno · 1h 03m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lilly Palmer.
In short
Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023 by Lilly Palmer scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).
Lilly Palmer demonstrates why she is a top-tier professional, delivering a set that is both technically flawless and high-impact.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts during breakdowns to further heighten the sense of anticipation.
- Incorporate subtle melodic motifs that recur throughout the set to strengthen the narrative thread.
- Ensure that gain levels are perfectly matched during fast cuts to avoid any perceived energy dips.
- Consider using more varied percussion layers during long blends to add extra depth to the groove.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Smooth transition from the radio intro into the first high-energy track, maintaining momentum.
Precise handover of the bass frequencies, keeping the groove locked and the energy high.
Expertly timed transition using a breakdown to reset energy before a powerful drop.
A very smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic groove perfectly.
Effective use of filtering to create space for the incoming track's lead element.
A bold move that mostly works, though there's a slight energy dip just before the drop.
Seamless transition where the incoming kick takes over perfectly on the 32nd bar.
Effective use of filtering to build tension before slamming into the next track's main groove.
Smooth integration of a vocal hook from the incoming track while maintaining the outgoing rhythm.
About this hard techno set
Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023 is a hard techno DJ set by Lilly Palmer, running 1h 03m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Lilly Palmer demonstrates why she is a top-tier professional, delivering a set that is both technically flawless and high-impact.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 27 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
9 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 585.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Lilly Palmer demonstrates why she is a top-tier professional, delivering a set that is both technically flawless and high-impact.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%87
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%91
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%86
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%83
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%92
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (9)
Intro speech to first track blend
Smooth transition from the radio intro into the first high-energy track, maintaining momentum.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Precise handover of the bass frequencies, keeping the groove locked and the energy high.
Breakdown transition into high-energy drop
Expertly timed transition using a breakdown to reset energy before a powerful drop.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
A very smooth transition that maintains the hypnotic groove perfectly.
Filter sweep and quick mid-range swap
Effective use of filtering to create space for the incoming track's lead element.
Fast cut on the drop
A bold move that mostly works, though there's a slight energy dip just before the drop.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Seamless transition where the incoming kick takes over perfectly on the 32nd bar.
High-pass filter sweep into drop
Effective use of filtering to build tension before slamming into the next track's main groove.
Vocal layering and mid-range swap
Smooth integration of a vocal hook from the incoming track while maintaining the outgoing rhythm.
Technical subscores
90
EQ balance
95
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
90
Loudness control
92
Musical coherence
87
Harmonic compatibility
91
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
22 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
218 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
3,790
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
50
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
2701
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
130
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (2×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 53:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 1:30Energy Lock-In
- 6:45Percussive Peak
- 14:10Groove Lock
- 18:30Tension Peak
- 19:55Risky pressure or vibe dip
- 24:50Rhythmic Lock
- 28:15Atmospheric Shift
Coaching notes
- Experiment with more dramatic EQ cuts during breakdowns to further heighten the sense of anticipation.
- Incorporate subtle melodic motifs that recur throughout the set to strengthen the narrative thread.
- Ensure that gain levels are perfectly matched during fast cuts to avoid any perceived energy dips.
- Consider using more varied percussion layers during long blends to add extra depth to the groove.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Lilly Palmer's Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023 get?
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #023?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 03m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Lilly Palmer sets analysed
- Lilly Palmer - Essential Mix 2022-05-2887
- Lilly Palmer live at EDC Las Vegas neonGarden 17/05/202486
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #06785
- BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix by Lilly Palmer May ´2285
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #05785
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #04684
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #04784
- Lilly Palmer pres. Spannung Radio Show #05584
Similar hard techno sets
- Clara Cuvé — SPFDJ with Clara Cuvé - 08 October 201985
- Klangkuenstler — klangkuenstler from HÖR Berlin85
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry | Bridge recording By the Creek 202685
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry - Live @ Ultra Miami 202685
- FJAAK — FJAAK - BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix85
- Klangkuenstler — klangkuenstler @ Outworld Secret Rave, Berlin85
- Clara Cuvé — CLARA CUVÉ I UNREAL STAGE I Nibirii Festival (FULL SET).m4a85
- 999999999 — 999999999 @ Awakenings Easter Festival 202285
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research